DNA LABS = DO NOT ASSUME!US: WASHINGTON, - A sharply critical independent audit found that Virginia's nationally recognized central crime laboratory had botched DNA tests in a leading capital murder case. The findings prompted Gov. Mark Warner to order a review of the lab's handling of testing in 150 other cases as well.
Among the auditors' eight recommendations, all of which were accepted by Mr. Warner, were that the governor restrict the work of the lab's chief DNA scientist, Jeffrey Ban; review 40 cases that Mr. Ban has handled in recent years, along with a sample totaling 110 additional cases; and develop procedures to insulate the lab from any outside political pressures.
Experts said the findings could lead to a re-examination of scores of past prosecutions, including those involving some of the nearly two dozen inmates on Virginia's death row, and might also throw into turmoil many current prosecutions in which the lab's work helped identify or rule out suspects.
"You have to have doubts about the reliability of any case coming out of there," said Betty Layne DesPortes, a criminal defense lawyer from Richmond who heads a legal panel for the American Academy of Forensic Science. "How can we be sure that this case wasn't typical?" she said of the handling of evidence in the prosecution of Earl Washington Jr.
The governor called for the independent audit of the lab last fall in response to the case of Mr. Washington, a retarded man who came within days of execution for a rape and killing before DNA evidence, though not resolving the case, did raise doubts about his guilt.
The audit's findings come at a time when DNA is growing in importance in implicating and exonerating suspects. Forensic labs in several states, including Oklahoma and Texas, have come under intense scrutiny for their mishandling of that and other evidence.
The outside auditors, from the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors, found that the Virginia lab's internal review process was flawed. They also raised concerns that lab workers had felt pressured by their superiors as well as the office of Jim Gilmore, who was governor when a flawed test of newly discovered DNA was conducted in 2000, to produce quick and conclusive reports in the Washington case, even when the evidence was muddled.
"Pressures from outside the laboratory and excessive managerial influence from within the laboratory," the report said, "had a detrimental effect on the analyst's decisions, examinations and reports in this case."
In an interview, Mr. Gilmore, a death penalty supporter now in private law practice, said that while he had "demanded all the proper evidence we could get," he had never asked the lab to reach any particular conclusion.
Virginia has executed more people, 94, than any other state except Texas since the Supreme Court allowed reinstatement of the death penalty 29 years ago. Mr. Washington was initially sentenced to death for the 1982 rape and fatal stabbing of Rebecca Williams, a 19-year-old mother from Culpepper, Va., but the sentence was commuted by Gov. Douglas Wilder in 1994. He was then pardoned by Mr. Gilmore in 2000 because of DNA evidence that raised doubts about his guilt.
But because of mistakes in the DNA tests by the crime lab in 1993, his lawyers assert, he stayed on death row seven years longer than necessary. And additional botched testing in 2000, they say, is the reason he has never been fully exonerated.
"This laboratory touts itself as the best state lab in the country, yet it generated these wrong test results in a capital case twice," said Peter Neufeld, a lawyer for Mr. Washington who is co-director of the Innocence Project. "This case raises very serious questions about the legitimacy of the capital justice system."
Mr. Washington, 45, is living in a home for the mentally retarded on Virginia's Eastern Shore. When he was told Friday afternoon about the audit's findings, he said he hoped he would now be officially declared innocent in the Williams murder, Mr. Neufeld said.
Mr. Ban, a nationally recognized forensic scientist who has helped other states develop DNA policies, trained many members of the Virginia lab's staff. As a result, the auditors recommended that independent experts review tests by other analysts there involving low levels of DNA - the type of evidence used in the Williams case - to ensure that similar problems were not rampant at the lab.
The audit found an array of problems in the way Mr. Ban had conducted and analyzed DNA tests in the Williams case. Those mistakes caused him to conclude incorrectly that a convicted serial rapist named Kenneth Tinsley was not the source of semen found in Ms. Williams, even though he had been found to be the source of DNA on a blanket at the crime scene.
But a test commissioned by Mr. Washington's lawyers in 2004 pointed to Mr. Tinsley as the likely sole source of the DNA found in Ms. Williams. Had the state lab come to the same conclusion, Mr. Washington's lawyers claim, Mr. Tinsley would have been prosecuted for the Williams murder years ago. He never has been, though Mr. Neufeld said he was now imprisoned in an unrelated rape case.
The Virginia legislature enacted a law this year that makes the Division of Forensic Science, which runs the central crime lab, an independent state agency and creates an advisory board, made up in part by division employees, to help oversee its work. But Mr. Neufeld said the legislation did not go far enough because it did not create an entirely independent office to review the lab's work.
"The audit provides compelling evidence that crime labs can't police themselves," Mr. Neufeld said.
Paul B. Ferrara, the director of the Division of Forensic Science, who in the past refused to acknowledge any errors in the Washington case, declined to be interviewed. But in a statement, he said the audit "belies the major body of other work" by Mr. Ban that helped lead to Mr. Washington's pardon.
Ms. DesPortes, of the forensic science academy, criticized Mr. Ferrara for what she described as his failure to shield Mr. Ban from "typical" political pressure on crime labs. She said his response to the audit suggested that he would not vigorously carry out its recommendations.
"He seems to think a perfect lab is one where errors never occur," she said. "But errors are going to occur. A perfect system is one that is able to catch its mistakes, and correct them."
By JAMES DAO posted 9 May 05
Related:
Witch-hunt targets scientists
QLD: SCIENTISTS at the John Tonge Centre are being threatened with jail in the wake of a government hunt for the source of leaks highlighting serious problems in the forensic laboratories.
Fresh swipe at DNA labs
Scientist Kris Bentley, whose departure yesterday follows that of forensic biologist Deanna Belzer after concerns about "inaccurate" DNA results and unvalidated equipment, issued a scathing resignation letter leaked to The Courier-Mail.
DNA leads 'CSI' cold-case squad to first arrest?
Frozen case? I don't really know what to say about them until they come up with their case. They say it involves DNA evidence but that's the only stuff we know.
Criminal's DNA filed under relative's name
The New South Wales Opposition is calling for an investigation into claims that police have entered DNA data for serious offenders under incorrect names.
DNA Evidence of Bipartisanship
Last week the U.S. Congress passed the Justice for All Act, which includes provisions of the Innocence Protection Act. As of this posting, the legislation has not yet been signed by President Bush. Attached is an analysis of the legislation prepared by the Justice Project.
DNA fingerprinting 'no longer foolproof'...
The genetic profiles held by police for criminal investigations are not sophisticated enough to prevent false identifications, according to the father of DNA fingerprinting.
THE BUTLER DIDN'T DO IT!
PROFESSOR BARRY BOETTCHER: Now, there should be a law enacted within Queensland so that when cases come up like this they can be brought to attention and if an appropriate authority such as a judge of your Supreme Court considers that it merits further inquiry, an inquiry be ordered.
'Rape' officer clears his name
UK: A former policeman has been cleared of rape after protesting his innocence for 15 years. Judges at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh ruled that Brian Kelly, 47, had suffered a miscarriage of justice over crucial DNA evidence.
Death Penalty Forensics?
In proposing a new death penalty for Massachusetts last month, Governor Mitt Romney offered firm assurance that no innocent people would be executed: Convictions, he said, will be based on science.
New unit investigates unsolved deaths?
A new police unit has been established to investigate more than 360 unsolved deaths in New South Wales, with many of the deaths dating back more than 30 years.
QLD Prisoners DNA Bid THE curious case of Queensland's "cat lady" murder is set to test the state's legal authorities again, with the man convicted of the killing asking the Attorney-General to take the unprecedented step of releasing blood samples for DNA retesting.
Prisoner's bid for review denied
Prisoner Roger Cheney has lost a Supreme Court action to have a judicial review of his 1993 convictions an 30-year jail sentence. Justice Shaw said he was concerned about the prisoner's claim that DNA evidence held by the police could prove his innocence. Although Cheney had requested the results of the DNA tests, he had been denied access to the forensic analysis.
Database clears up crimes?
NSW Police Minister John Watkins said at the launch of a Sydney conference of international forensic experts meeting to mark 100 years of fingerprinting in NSW. He said the collection of DNA from prisoners and suspects in NSW during the past two years had led to more than 5,400 matches on the forensic database.
A Question of Innocence
Katrina Bolton: The promise of DNA freeing the innocent as well as convicting the guilty has been repeated by politicians across Australia, usually while DNA laws are being expanded. The promise was made as a national DNA database, ‘Crimtrac’ was created, and it was made as NSW introduced legislation giving unprecedented powers to take DNA samples from prisoners, by force if necessary.
Weak Carr Government suspends Innocence Panel
It's a callous disregard for justice! The panel takes applications from convicted prisoners for DNA evidence to be analysed a move that may help in a future court appeal.
JUST BEAT IT! Govt lauds crime-solving technology?
The New South Wales Government says advances in crime solving technology are helping the progress of hundreds of police investigations.
DNA yours or mine?
Now they have isolated two genes that they say tells you if you're more likely to be depressed. What does that mean? It could mean that you should stay in jail because you are more likely than not to continue your offending behaviour according to a Department of Corrective Services Forensic Psychiatrist.
DNA testing causes debate in murder case
The use of voluntary DNA testing in the investigation of a murder case in New South Wales has been applauded by victim support groups who are ill informed about the process said Justice Action's spokesperson Gregory Kable.
Abolition of double jeopardy law a political stunt: NSW Opp
Why draconian laws? What about the re-trial by media that goes along with it? Twice shy?
ARE YOU INNOCENT?
The NSW government has finally appointed somebody (Justice John Nader) to head up its Innocence Panel and has produced leaflets and forms for people convicted of serious crimes (eg murder) to apply for DNA testing if they believe it may help prove their innocence. You can get the info by phoning 1300 881 717 or writing to the panel at GPO Box 45 Sydney NSW 2001.
Is the Westminster System flawed?
Most people would say Lady Di got the boot and NSW has so much trouble getting the Innocence Panel moving. I said hey, what's going on!
Murder charge first for DNA data bank link, but not the same as solving the murder Mass DNA testing of prisoners has led to the first NSW case of a person being charged with a previously unsolved murder as a result of a controversial gene-matching data bank. The Herald reported 25 Nov 02 "a DNA saliva swab led to the charging of a former prisoner with the bashing murder of a woman. Police had been unable to find any witnesses or suspects following the murder in Sydney's inner city two years ago. Detectives had admitted they faced a tough job finding the killer."
Prisoners can prove innocence for $20
Les Kennedy Daily Telegraph reported today that" Prisoners who believe that DNA will prove they were wrongly convicted will have the chance to prove their innocence for a mere $20 administration fee. The move comes 20 months after NSW inmates were asked to provide DNA for comparison with a databank of DNA from unsolved crime scenes for possible convictions.
DNA = Do Not Assume - DNA Controversies!
The national DNA database of all known offenders proposed by Prime Minister Tony Blair could mean that innocent people will be accused of crimes they did not commit.
Here come de Judge - Time to Leave [266]
There have always been examples of rulings and interpretations that have supported the saying "The law is an ass". This is increasingly the case, because even the best intentioned judges are now facing an avalanche of new technologies and social change. But, it is no good making excuses for the judiciary and continuing to accept their strange interpretations. We must recognise that not only judges but the whole legal system will struggle more and more. In the end the whole system will become a farce. This is the way empires end.
2nd Renaissance -15 The Rabbits And The Wolves [180]
Historically, there have been periods when legal distinctions between animals and humans have been blurred. For instance, in medieval Europe, in the 14th and 15th centuries, numerous trials and executions of animals occurred. One source identifies 34 recorded instances of pigs having been tried and cruelly put to death. Besides pigs; rats, chickens, goats, and bees were similarly tried. Some of the pigs were fully dressed in human clothes at the time they were, inevitably, found guilty. In one case a vicar excommunicated a flock of sparrows that infested his church. All this happened despite the theological stance that animals had no soul, and no morals or conscience. They could not really be guilty of transgressing the Rule of Law.
