Tuesday, July 27, 2004


Provoked Chicken Farmer Bali Bombing Patsies

Provoked CIA Bali bombing patsies executions 'can proceed' regardless of the constitution.

Indonesia's Justice Minister says he would be happy to see the Bali bombers, [USA, CIA, call to arms false flag operation and those patsies], who are on death row executed, despite a court ruling that the law they were convicted under is unconstitutional.

Well I'm glad he is not our justice minister.

Someone who has the responsibility to uphold the law, according to the constitution, would be better suited to the job wouldn't you think?

The constitutional court last week found that the laws used to convict one of the Bali bomb, [pastsy], plotters, Maskur Abdul Kadir, were invalid because they were applied retrospectively.

[And they never charged the CIA for the provocation of the pastsies and and the 2nd military hardware grade mini-nuke on the Sari Club.]

The ruling has sparked significant confusion about which cases it affects.

Justice Minister Yusril Mahendra insists the finding cannot overturn previously completed cases, including those of the condemned, [patsy chicken farmers], Amrozi, Imam Samudra and Mukhlas, because it cannot be applied retrospectively.

A number of defence lawyers disagree, saying the Bali bombers' cases are not complete and can still be appealed.

But Yusril Mahendra says he would see no problem with the Bali bombers on death row being executed now.

"They can do it, they can implement it, they can execute," he said.

[And it also hides more of the real truth about the CIA involvement in the Mini Nuke military hardware used in the 2nd Bali Bomb Blase on the Sari club.]

Prosecutors are expected to request a sentence, possibly the death sentence, for another of the, [alleged], Bali bombing ringleaders, Idris, in a Jakarta court today.

But there is confusion over whether his trial can proceed under the now-invalid anti-terrorism law. [Draconian Laws.]

Human Right in Indonesia

Article 9

Before assuming their duties, the president and vice president shall take an oath according to the requirements of religion, or shall make a solemn promise, before the People's Consultative Assembly or the House of Representatives, as follows:

Oath of the president (vice president)

"In the Name of God, I swear that I will fulfill, to the best of my ability and as justly as possible, the duties of the president (vice president) of the Republic of Indonesia; that I will firmly uphold the Constitution and faithfully implement all laws and regulations, and will devote myself to the service of Country and Nation".

Promise of the president (vice president)

"I solemnly promise that I will fulfill, to the best of my ability and as justly as possible, the duties of the president (vice president) of the Republic of Indonesia; that I will firmly uphold the Constitution and faithfully implement all laws and regulations, and that I will devote myself to the service of Country and Nation".

[However Indonesia is totally corrupt from the top down.]

By The Constitution 27 July 04

Related Updated 2009 Links:

To be an unfortunate person in a country, which uses the death penalty for certain crimes, is to assume more "respect" from the Australian Prime Minister John Howard, than our founding fathers might have ever imagined.

Greens want Flood to front Bali inquiry
Greens Senator Bob Brown wants the author of a key report into Australia's intelligence agencies to appear before a Senate committee examining the Bali bombings.

Australia's Terrorism Wake Up Call [164] The horrific bombings of the Sari Club and Paddy's Bar in Bali, on October 12, 2002, considerably strengthened the hand of the CoW in pursuing the War on Terror. Here was an opportunity to harden the hearts of the Australian and US public against Islamic fundamentalists. It was also a chance for the Indonesian government to justify harsh measures in the war against terrorists and secessionists, such at those in the province of Aceh.

Fool me twice 1-20 -Official release (BALI BOMBINGS/ETimor) Exposing the Australian government's lies about the East Timor massacres, the cover-up of the Bali bombings (including '93 WTC attack) and subsequent anti-terror legislation forced through parliament.

The Truth About Bali Bombings Part 1 REMIX Part One + Two: Que Bono. Who Benefited? The Bali Bombings were a direct US-Israeli response to the growing Peace marches and Anti War Movement in Australia that was ballooning at an alarming rate after 9-11 and after Bush announced he was waging illegal invasions. It also very quickly secured Indonesia's and Australia's subservience to the US and cemented involvement in the US led War on Terror, and subsequent illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Part TWO: Who really Benefited from the Bali Bombings?

PART THREE: The Investigation(s) Or lack thereof The Primary man at the centre of the Bali investigations got warned off the scent by US Ambassador to Indonesia..

Part 4: The Truth About Bali Bombings Eye witness Testimony and memorial dedication..

PM's Fox Defence? Less the evidence?
[War criminal], Prime Minister John Howard says he does not regret, [?], sending Australian troops, [militants], to war, [on], Iraq, despite an, [alleged], finding by Philip Flood, his decision was based on "thin, ambiguous and incomplete" intelligence. But Howard had a strong case?

Indonesian Election: Australia $48 Million?
The threat from terror groups and failed states means Australia needs a high-tech, rapid deployment defence force, the defence minister says.

Australians to be sacrificed: Howard
Howard vowed hostages wouldn't sway policy? The Federal Government say they would not negotiate with terrorists if an Australian were taken hostage in Iraq.

US-Australian 'Free Raid Agreement' and Labor's Ploy?
Allegedly speculation is rife in political circles about whether the Senate will follow the lead of the US Congress, and approve a free trade deal with the United States?

PM Howard Morally Bankrupt
Prime Minister John Howard insists the war in Iraq was justified despite his British counterpart Tony Blair's concession that weapons of mass destruction might never be found.

Howard 'should be tried for war crimes'
Former Liberal Party federal president John Valder says Prime Minister John Howard should be tried and punished for war crimes over Australia's involvement in the Iraq conflict.

Troop deployment not a deepening of effort: Hill
Deploying an extra 30 troops to Iraq was not a deepening of Australia's involvement because they were being sent to protect those already there, Defence Minister Robert Hill said yesterday.

War on terrorism' could take a generation: Downer?
Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer has launched the Government's terrorism white paper, saying the "war" could take a generation.

Heaven Must Be Missing An Angel?
Well praise the Lord the light is Hell bent here on Peter Costello, treasurer of the Howard Government who now has his own "flock" of onward Christian Soldiers.

Latham moves to 'compromise' on US relations

Howard Vs Regina in Canberra the Capital Territory of Australia- Friday January 30 2004.


Well think about this! Australia's intelligence agencies look set to receive a substantial funding boost in this year's Federal Budget, with the Prime Minister saying it is an obvious step to take.

Howard, where's your head at?
Australians living on the edge! Seems each time the bombs go off overseas Australians are living on the edge.

Should John Howard be locked up indefinitely?
Australian convicted mock terrorist John Howard is seriously considering appealing the precise time limit on detaining terrorist suspects.

Daily Terror rolled-over for Howard's war games
The DAILY TERROR is suspected of being the source of the news this morning that Willie Brigitte is a terrorist and that Sydney faces a bomb attack.

Why ASIO / ONA / DFAT / DIO Directors should be dismissed and the Minister for Foreign Affairs should resign.