Howard has increased the Risk of terrorism

Repost from Anarchist Age Number 667

"The Prime Minister vindicated by the arrest of terror suspects in Melbourne and Sydney" hardly. Those Australians who doubted the PM's sincerity when they questioned the timing of his release of information into the public arena that Australia faced the prospect of an imminent terrorist outrage, have egg on their faces, I doubt it. I distinctly remember how John Howard, his brow furrowed, told Australians that he didn't want people who threw their children overboard in this country. Four years later, it's commonly accepted that no refugee threw their children overboard and the great majority of asylum seekers involved in that incident now live in Australia.

VINDICATED

I distinctly remember the PM telling the world that Australia couldn't wait for the UN to make up its mind about whether Iraq should be invaded, because the Baath Party, led by Saddam Hussein, had weapons of mass destruction at their disposal. Nearly 3 years later, those elusive weapons have still not materialised.

Whether the terror suspects that have been arrested and charged were involved in something as innocent as a discussion group or whether they were, as he has been extensively reported in the media on the verge of committing a terrorist outrage, is a matter for public conjecture. It's up to the courts, not the PM, the Victorian and NSW Premiers, their Chief Police Commissioners or the media to decide these men's innocence or guilt. [It's not even up to the courts when the courts have to do as the parliament say i.e. draconian laws.]

Currently, both the view that these men were arrested by the thought police for they were thinking or the community has been saved from a terrorist outrage by a group of potential suicide murders, is legitimate. [No both views are not legitimate mate, this is rubbish because these people are being used as scapegoats to bolster support for the Coalition of the Killing's resource wars in the Middle East, otherwise the law would never have been made DRACONIAN.] If the judiciary is able to hold its nerve, despite the current political and media barrage to convict these men before they have faced their accusers in court, the community will find out the outcome in due course. [No not really because Draconian laws means that the outcome, my friend, is bent, all you are getting is the DRACONIAN OUTCOME.]

Unfortunately, the next group of people who are arrested under the new batch of terrorist and sedition laws won't be so lucky. [You mean it gets worse?] They will be able to be secretly detained and interrogated with minimal judicial intervention and no media scrutiny. They can have what few rights and liberty they enjoy stripped away from them, their lives and the lives of their families and communities destroyed, because some faceless bureaucrat in ASIO believes they pose a potential threat to the community. [Well actually it can't get much worse than solitary confinement for anyone because that in itself without any other mistreatment is torture.]

The removal of rights and privileges, checks and balances that have existed for generations will not make the community safer as John Howard keeps telling us, but will create a climate of angry disillusionment and isolation among sections of the Australian community that will increase, not decrease, the possibility of a home grown terrorist outrage.

POLITICAL AUTHORITY

Irrespective of the state of perpetual fear that the Howard government is fostering in the community, irrespective of the draconian authoritarian legislation that is being pushed through Parliament, irrespective of the total capitulation of the Federal Opposition, ultimate political authority rests in the hands of the people, not the government of the day or the State. The Federal government can pass whatever legislation it likes, whether it is able to enforce that legislation is a different matter.

Governments normally rule through community consensus, not by force. Those that resort to force, sow the seed of rebellion among the people they rule. Whether the Howard government is able to implement its legislative agenda is not determined by its ability to push its legislation through Parliament, but whether it can convince people that the curtailment of their rights, privileges and freedoms is in their best interests. Governments that stop listening to the people they rule, who believe they know what is best for them, create a culture of dissatisfaction and resistance within the communities they rule.

A government's legitimacy is determined by the cultural consensus it is able to create within the community for its political program. Once a significant minority rejects a government's legitimacy, its ability to impose its political program on them by exercising the monopoly on force governments enjoy, is compromised. It seems the Howard government has bitten off more than it can chew; the resistance to Howard's ideological wet dream is not just limited to a disenfranchised minority, it is extending into his own party room.

The instability that is being created by his four pronged attack on the Australian people by the passage of his Industrial Relations (Destruction), anti-terrorist (Dissent), Welfare to Work (Slavery) and media ownership laws, will escalate as the Howard government tries to implement its legislative agenda by threatening to bankrupt and imprison those that oppose these laws.

Whether the corporate sector and his political supporters have the nerve and stomach to wield the big stick that he is threatening to use and put the significant gains they have made over the past 20 under threat, or whether they sacrifice Howard on the altar or economic and political expediency, is another matter.

HOW CONVENIENT!

How convenient, on the very day the Howard government introduced its Industrial 'Destruction' legislation into Parliament, the Prime Minister breathlessly tells the Australian people that he has just received information that the country faces an imminent terrorist outrage. Ho hum, I wonder if the people who passed on the information that ASIO has passed onto the Prime Minister, has come from the very same people that told the Prime Minister that Australia had to invade Iraq because the Baath Party has 'weapons of mass destruction' at their disposal.

John Howard hasn't much of a reputation when it comes to telling the truth. When you consider his core and non core promises, the children overboard fiasco and his never never a GST saga, any sane rational person isn't going to take much notice of the boy who has learned to call wolf whenever he doesn't want people to pay close attention to what he is doing. If we faced a potential terrorist outrage, you'd think he'd do something about it, instead of recalling the Senate.

First, he is responsible for creating the conditions that have increased Australia's risk of becoming a terrorist target, then he uses that potential risk to divert the public's attention from legislation that will wipe away from the gains made through over 100 years of community and workplace struggle. Talk about Machiavellian; Machiavelli was an amateur when compared to our beloved Prime Minister.

Howard may think he can fool most of the people most of the time, but there is no way he is going to fool all of us all the time. There are terrorists living in Australia, they wear suits, appear on television during the evening news and use the spectre of terrorism to bolster their political position. They push legislation through Parliament that does more damage than any terrorist outrage could ever do. The Industrial 'Destruction' legislation that is being lobbed into Parliament by the Prime Minister with the adroitness of an SAS soldier throwing a hand grenade into a bunker, will eventually maim and kill thousands of Australians.

Yes Virginia, politicians do exist who will use all the means at their disposal to deflect the fourth estate's attention from the main parliamentary game. Fortunately for the country, there are an increasing number of Australians who have learnt to ignore the boy who's called wolf once too often, and have their eyes firmly on the only game in town the Industrial 'Destruction' legislation - that has been introduced into Parliament by a government that has deserted its constituents in favour of corporate Australia.

Read more at: Anarchistmedia.org

By Joseph Toscano posted 10 November 05

Evidence that Howard was complicit in CIA, false flag, call to arms, Bali bombings

War criminal John Howard was complicit in the call to arms - false flag operation - Bali bombings - instigated by the CIA - and the Coalition of the Killing - to bolster support - and quell dissent for their illegal and degrading resource wars in the Middle East.

Related:

PM blamed for increased terrorism risk
"To continue to heap on one group of Australians responsibility for the behaviour of people over whom they have no control, without at the same time saying: 'and we the rest of Australia will accept our responsibility for what it is that we have done that has increased or enhanced the risk of terrorism'," Mr Stanhope said.

Terrified scapegoats 'kept in dark'
The lawyer representing nine men facing terrorism charges [scapegoats for the Coalition of the Killing's resource wars in the Middle East] says he must wait an unacceptably long time for police to provide a brief of evidence.

Man shot by police in ASIO fishing raids
A man shot by police in fishing raids this morning is in a satisfactory condition after undergoing surgery at Liverpool Hospital in Sydney's south-west.

GOP Leaders to Bush: 'Your Presidency is Effectively Over'
“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

The real reason behind the push for a "Police State"
911 was also faked... those 3 WTC buildings collapsed due to controlled demolition charges... there was also no passenger jet plane debris found at the official Pentagon "crash" site! Why is it that your steel BBQ grill does not sag and melt when you expose it to fire or a gas burner? Because in 1 atmosphere air pressure, open-air flames cannot reach the softening temperature for steel (due to not enough oxygen reaching the flame), so how can 850,000 tone steel structured concrete buildings fail by melting, collapsing in only 10 seconds each?

Brisbane to protest HoWARd at charity function
Australia: Brisbane activists and concerned citizens will protest John Howard at his attendance at a charity ball this Wednesday, November 9th. The man who banned the word 'hypocrite' in parliament will be attending a gala fundraising dinner event for Rosies this week in Brisbane.

Open Letter to Kim Beazley
Dear Kim, dear polluticians, I really want to know before Christmas, why you are in the Labor Party, and not in the Liberal Party. (Me too!)

Bush, God and Transnationals
The tragedy (for the entire world) is not that Bush is delusional, mentally unstable and intellectually challenged - that is well known. Rather, it is that he remains as commander in chief of the USA - placed in that position by commercial and other financial interests.

The race that doesn't stop the nation
CANBERRA: And welcome to Canberra on the first Tuesday in November for the race that doesn't stop the nation. The Anti-Terrorism Cup. The final horses are being brought into the barriers, and we are almost ready for the start.

Constitution: Defending Against State Terror and Despots
Australia has no major laws that are not derivatives of English Law and all of our major laws rely on British court precedents for interpretation and implementation. These laws and our Constitutional Monarchy system create a situation where, even if Howard and all State Premiers vote unanimously on the Anti-Terrorist laws, and every ALP/Dem/Lib/Nat/Green party hack also votes unanimously on their laws, and even if such laws are given Royal Assent, those laws are still void.

Open Letter to Australian Senate
Every West Australian needs to take note of the proposed terror legislation that will be debated in the Senate next Tuesday. Our own Premier has sold us out, and the time has come for some serious and organised protest in WA to protect our democracy and civil liberties. Write to the Senate, to the papers, and to every political party. This is a fundamental issue that affects the future of our society.

Australia: Right to strike to go
'The right of workers to leave their jobs is a test of freedom. Hitler suppressed strikes. Stalin suppressed strikes. But each also suppressed freedom. There are some things worse than strikes, much worse than strikes - one of them is the loss of freedom.' US President Eisenhower.

Australia, the International Image and disintegration of human-rights The international image of Australia is, by now, surely under question, if not from the governments of the international community, then from the organisations such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the United Nations. And not least from the citizens of the world who watch the news, seeing Australia but thinking South Africa, or Communist Russia.

Stanhope flags doubts on 'hasty' terrorism bill
ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope says he may refuse to sign off on parts of the Federal Government's hasty terrorism bill.

Unfair Industrial Laws: It's up to you!
When the WorkChoices legislation was before Parliament, GetUp members sent emails to Senators Barnaby Joyce and Steven Fielding asking them to stay strong and independent. This was followed up with a national telephone campaign.

Our human rights are poor: judge
Australia's reputation as a human rights champion [?] had been so tarnished in recent years that it could be called a wolf in sheep's clothing, the retiring High Court justice Michael McHugh said yesterday.

Question Everything: Worry, be alert and alarmed!
BELIEF in the future is perhaps the most important value for a free society. It is what makes so many interested in getting an education, or investing in a project, or being nice to their neighbours. If we think nothing can improve or that the world is coming to an end, we don't work hard for a better and more civilised future. And we will all be miserable.

It's not the terrorists' it's us
While we watch the latest round of appalling violence and mayhem spilling across our screens it is worth considering its cause.

Spots and Stripes
It is well known that John Howard, infamous lackey and liar, is devoid of anything that could be remotely regarded as masculine or manly; the draconian measures he has implemented to 'secure' Australia against the terrorist bogeyman are astounding.

ABC: Inside the Insiders
These shows demonstrate how even our best mainstream news/current affair shows are effectively another corrupt decoy for career politicians (and the rich they serve) to legislate their way to further wealth... via media cronyism.

Australia: Cop Watch - drugs in the force
Taking the illegal drugs leads to the officers associating with drug suppliers, stealing drugs, stealing money and supplying friends, and providing confidential information to the drug suppliers.

Exporting the death penalty - Bali 9
Did the AFP believe the Bali 9 would get an 'on the spot' fine or something? ...and had observers present during one of the drug raids by Indonesian police claim they have - "ended co-operation with Indonesian police investigating the Bali Nine because they could face the firing squad if convicted."

Nuclear Power PR campaign debunked by report
Anti-nuclear activists replied to advocates of nuclear power with a comprehensive damning report 'Nuclear Power - No Solution to Climate Change'. Fifty people attended the launch held at Northcote Town Hall organised by Friends of the Earth. Speakers included report author, Dr Jim Green, physicist Dr Alan Roberts, and President of the Medical Association for the Prevention of War, Dr Tilmin Ruff.

News on David Hicks:
Hicks is being used as a 'pawn' for prime Meanster john hoWARD's war crimes against humanity. HoWARd has also been linked to his co-offenders, tony bliar, and george w bushit's, US Military Industrial regime.

Victorian cops the most corrupt in Australia
A weekly round up of news on the cops. Former Australian Crime Commission Chair says Victorian cops are the most corrupt in Australia -- so they are given extra powers -- and so Melburnians can be patrolled by the army -- and have business deals with McDonalds. Top cops in NSW cleared after investigation -- but another one charged with child slavery. Western Australian police officer leaves the force under secrecy -- and Canberra hospital nurse tells the Federal Police to bugger off.

What is Happening to Australian Democracy
"Australia nominally has all the right democratic institutions--regular elections, parliamentary sovereignty, ministerial responsibility, an independent judiciary, federalism, a non-partisan and expert public service and a free press.

Hundreds attempt self-harm in detention
Nearly 900 immigration detainees have tried to harm themselves in the past three years, Immigration Department figures reveal.

The clock is ticking: Aboriginal Leaders
Aboriginal leaders say only immediate action will remedy the appalling state of remote communities in the Northern Territory, writes.

Association for the Prevention of Torture
The Optional Protocol requires 20 ratifications to enter into force. All States Parties to the UN Convention against Torture should seriously consider ratifying the OPCAT as soon as possible. National Institutions and others promoting the human rights of people deprived of their liberty need to be informed of their potential role as national preventive mechanisms under the OPCAT.

Pressure remains on Australia as Kyoto takes effect
Australia and the United States have both refused to ratify the deal, arguing it is not in their best interest. They will be denied access to a new international trading market where developing countries will get credits for cutting back emissions.

Australian Terror cell here long before Bali
The Australian terrorist Captain Cook infiltrated Australia years before the Bali bombings in which 202 people perished. Aboriginal people attempted to remember Captain Cook not as a founding father but as a harbinger of dispossession and death, a sign of white amnesia. Another anniversary year-used to mark two hundred years since Cook had journeyed along the east coast of Australia and, for some people, discovered a continent.

Evidence that Howard was complicit in CIA, false flag, call to arms, Bali bombings War criminal John Howard was complicit in the call to arms - false flag operation - Bali bombings - instigated by the CIA - and the Coalition of the Killing - to bolster support - and quell dissent for their illegal and degrading resource wars in the Middle East.

Australia's Terrorism Wake Up Call [164] The horrific bombings of the Sari Club and Paddy's Bar in Bali, on October 12, 2002, considerably strengthened the hand of the CoW in pursuing the War on Terror. Here was an opportunity to harden the hearts of the Australian and US public against Islamic fundamentalists. It was also a chance for the Indonesian government to justify harsh measures in the war against terrorists and secessionists, such at those in the province of Aceh.

2nd Renaissance -10 The War on Witches [150]
In 1484, Pope Innocent VIII issued a Papal Bull that became the rationale for establishing the Inquisition in Germany. The following excerpt from the Bull sets out the official view of the danger of witches to the community. The Bull and this this passage provided the sole excuse for the torture and cruel executions that were, ultimately, to be the fate of up to fifty percent of the population of some villages.

WA Prisons: 'Pre Release Program' suspended?

"I have various times throughout my continuing, indefinite incarceration, felt as though I were a 'lone voice' in the middle of a screaming AFL Grand Final crowd."

A prisoner writes from Acacia Prison Wooraloo WA to Justice ACTION

Thank you for your most welcomed correspondence and the attachments of 06 July 2005, which I received this afternoon. I must also thank you for your previous correspondence of 31 May 2005.

The Prison Resource Kit contains a variety of information I am sure will be well read, thank you. I was quietly amused and agreeing with the poster illustrating imprisonment with the title,' Obedience To The Law is Freedom'. I think it is very apt, in my opinion, what constitutes 'The Law' is open to debate when it comes to 'Freedom'.

I am delighted to see that my previous letters have been accepted as material of interest and relevance by your organisation, and that this material has been put out there for inquisitive and interested eyes to see.

I was very much heartened by your kind comments and uplifting enthusiasm for issues that I am enthusiastic about also. I have various times throughout my continuing, indefinite incarceration, felt as though I were a 'lone voice' in the middle of a screaming AFL Grand Final crowd when it comes to issues of fairness and accountability in the justice system. I am pleased to understand that I am not alone in this regard.

I find it ironic and mildly sad in a way that I am under the control and care of a 'Department' that has the word 'Justice' in its title. Have I missed something? For the most part I understand that a multi faceted system beats to its own drum, and that 'Justice' is an objective most of the time, but I do feel sometimes that the drum isn't sounding out the right type of music.

Issues such as the decision by the Department Of Justice in Western Australia not to distribute the 'Just Us' periodic newspaper astound and concern me. To my knowledge, there is no equivalent publication that is already provided to prisoners in Western Australia.

On that note, at present I have received no further responses to my enquiries with the Department Of Justice relating to this matter, but I will keep you informed as I do.

I am also discussing the periodical Newsletter with people and suggesting that if they wish to be informed and to have their political voice heard, they may choose to write to Justice ACTION and have their details added to the Justice ACTION mailing list.

[Name suppressed for legal reasons because this prisoner was sent to prison at age 16]

I have recently commenced civil proceedings in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, in Perth. My case may be cited as [Prisoner] V Director General, Department Of Justice and Anor. XXX. XXX of 2005.

I have lodged a Writ of Habeas Corpus against the First Respondent, Director General, Department of Justice, and a Writ of Certiorari against the Second Respondent, the former Minister for Justice.

My first court appearance regarding these matters was on Thursday, 02 June 2005. This was an 'ex parte' hearing in Chambers before His honour Judge Blaxell. The matter has been adjourned to Wednesday, 15 June 2005. I hope to present oral submissions and argument on this day.

I have prepared the legal documents myself, and I am representing myself in these proceedings. It has been suggested to me that due to the highly political nature of my case in the past, and the foreseeable future, finding legal representation in Perth is very difficult. But I take this difficulty in my stride, and I am only too aware that I am the only person who knows my case and my contentions clearly.

I have enclosed three documents for your perusal and information, which have been filed with the Court already. These documents are:

* Notice Of Originating Motion (Form 64) [6 Pages]
* Outline Of Submissions For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus And A Writ Of Certiorari And Order Nisi [17 pages]
* Applicant's Amended List Of Authorities For Hearing On Wednesday 15 June 2005 [8 pages]

I am confident that you with be able to understand the directions I will be leading to in argument. The ad hominem contention is of particular interest. As this is a civil action, the case citing, which includes my surname, has been printed in The West Australian newspaper's Court listing. As I noted previously, the case has been adjourned to Wednesday, 15 June 2005, and on this date I will ask the Court for a suppression order relating to my name (my identity), and future Court Listings. I will be seeking to invoke ss 35 and 36 of the Children's Court Of Western Australia Act 1988, for the order.

I am not sure if your organisation is aware of this, but there is presently an inquiry investigating the activities of the Department Of Justice, in connection with the placement and management of prisoners in Western Australian Prisons, and in the community.

There have been a number of incidents of late involving the Department Of Justice, and few high profile inmates, which have received a barrage of media and public interest. The Liberal Party in Opposition has also taken the opportunity to berate the Labor Government concerning these incidents.

As a result of these incidents 14 prisoners, including life sentenced prisoners and Governor's pleasure sentenced prisoners, having done nothing to warrant punishment, were removed from minimum-security prison farms to medium and maximum security facilities. These 14 prisoners had been participating in a program of graduated release into the community. This program is colloquially known as the 'Pre Release Program'.

In response to these incidents, on 05 April 2005, Western Australia's Premier, Dr Geoff Gallop, signed a document that outlines the terms of reference of an 'independent' inquiry. The named inquiry is defined as: "INQUIRY INTO THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WITH REGARD TO THE MANAGEMENT OF OFFENDERS IN CUSTODY AND IN THE COMMUNITY"

The Honourable Dennis Mahoney, a former New South Wales Supreme Court Judge, has been named as the Inquirer for this Inquiry.

All of this has occurred after the Labor Government was returned to office in February of this year.

The new Minister for Justice, Honourable John D'Orazio, who has relieved Honourable Michelle Roberts, former Minister for Justice, has been appointed the new 'overseer' of the 'troublesome' Justice Portfolio. Mr D'Orazio, a multiple victim of crime himself, in response to the incidents involving the Department Of Justice, has stated in various media reports words to the effect that his priorities are:

(a) Community safety
(b) Staff safety within the justice system
(c) And then we will look at the rehabilitation of prisoners

Life sentenced prisoners and Governor's pleasure sentenced prisoners, who were participating in approved Pre Release Programs, and prisoners who hoped to be commencing Pre Release Programs, have been told that there will be no Pre Release Programs until further notice (indefinite suspension), pending the outcome of the 'independent inquiry.

It has been suggested that this action, or inaction of behalf of the Department Of Justice, and the Labor Government, is a form of group punishment perpetrated towards life sentenced prisoners and Governor's pleasure sentence prisoners, in my opinion this is correct.

The concept of group punishment is from days of old. What is going on in Western Australia? On that note, I shall sign off for now, and turn to my extensive authorities list for my up and coming legal action. I hope that my efforts continue to be of assistance to Justice ACTION and I look forward to hearing from you again.

Kind Regards

By Just Us 4 August 05

Ed. Likewise my friend how you have grown in your knowledge and your wisdom from a 16-year-old boy into a fine scholar, from juvenile detention into adult prison, with a lot of knowledge to share with the community. God willing, people who make their first mistake in my opinion always deserve a second chance. A second chance to prove to the community and themselves that they can make it, so the community in turn will not diminish the standards of a human being so easily, after they have made their first mistake. Why? Because a human being is not infallible in the land of trial and error and people only learn by making a mistake. Some people make big mistakes and some people make small mistakes. Nevertheless it is a mistake when it's recognised but once that has occurred and a person has learned and has some insight into their offending behaviour that mistake is unlikely to occur ever again if 'treated properly' the first time.

But making your first mistake as a 'child' in our Wonderful Universe and then being incarcerated for it by the State 'indefinitely' is wrong and I think your case deserves special attention.

Surely there is an obligation by the Australian Constitution to grant you a second chance on the basis that you were a child when you committed your first offence and obviously did not have time to grow up before you tripped over and stubbed your toe on that rock that has been indefinitely tied around your neck ever since. Keep up the good work and let us know how you get on!

Every Best Wish

Harmful, Undeserved Punishment

US: Nearly five million American citizens are denied the right to vote - one of every 50 citizens. That includes 13 percent of all African-American men nationwide, up to almost twice that percentage in particular states and the majority of adults - black and white -- in some inner city neighborhoods.


Related:

POLITICAL 'GAGGING' IN THE WEST
I write with a pang of disheartening news to the ' Just Us' editors, from behind the wire at Acacia Prison.

Inquiry into West Australia's prison system
Prison Reform Group WA (PRGWA) notes the broad terms of reference as well as the robust independence of the inquiry. In establishing an inquiry that is motivated to provide a clear and fresh view of a beleaguered system it is hoped that an unbiased, clinical analysis free of the dreadful political mudslinging that has mired this area in the past may now be possible.

Overhaul Department of Justice: Reform Group
WA: The Prison Reform Group of WA is calling for a complete overhaul of the Department of Justice following recent events which have compromised its integrity, placing prison staff, prisoners, their families and the community, at risk. We call for the Minister to publicly apologise for last week's debacle which has seen the public badly let down by the Department of Justice yet again.

Crisis Brewing in State Jails
WA: Figures released today reveal one of the states worst kept secrets 'the prisons are filling fast and will soon be overflowing. The ABS figures released today showed that Western Australia's imprisonment rate continued to outstrip every other state in Australia.

NEW INDEPENDENT RISDON PRISON REPORT
Justice Action and Prison Action & Reform are not satisfied with the review and will present an independent report to Parliament in August, based upon interviews with prisoners, prison staff and concerned community members.

MORE PRISONERS LOCKDOWNS HAVE OFFICERS ON EDGE
NSW POLICE Commissioner Ken Moroney has issued an ultimatum as well, to the lawless youths holding Sydney's streets to ransom?: Learn some respect or face jail?

Tough line on crime fills jails
The tough law-and-order policies of governments around the nation are behind an explosion in the prison population by almost 80 per cent in the past two decades.

LEGAL VISITS AT PARKLEA PRISON
I am a prisoner in NSW and I am currently held in Parklea Prison. I am concerned about what is going on in NSW prisons and this is my story.

Parklea Prison: No calls for six days
The last calls that were made out of Parklea Correctional Complex by my partner, an inmate in remand at Parklea, was on Wednesday 2 February. The phone lines for the inmates have been out of service to this date.

Prison visits in crisis in NSW
The reason I am writing today is to address a difficult situation that my husband and my family are going through. My husband is currently serving a sentence at Lithgow Correctional Centre in NSW.

Prison boom will prove a social bust
Hardened criminals are not filling NSW's prisons - the mentally ill and socially disadvantaged are, writes Eileen Baldry.

The prison system requires assiduous oversight
As NSW Attorney General Bob Debus noted in 1996: "The kinds of complaints which occur in the system may seem trivial to outsiders but in the superheated world of the prison, such issues can produce explosive results."

Crime and Punishment
Mark Findlay argues that the present psychological approach to prison programs is increasing the likelihood of re-offending and the threat to community safety.

Justice Denied In NSW Corrective Services
There used to be a (VJ) or Visiting Justice who would go into the prison and judge any claim or accusation that was made by any prisoner or prison guard. If it were found that a prisoner had offended then punishment was metered out.

Prison guards test positive for drugs
NSW prison visitors banned from using the toilet The visit is only for about one hour and any thing less than that is an insult. If it's proved that a visitor has broken the rules the punishment should apply to them. But collective punishment on all visitors should not be made general when others haven't broken the rules especially if it restricts all visitors from normal human needs like using a toilet.

NSW prison visitors banned from using the toilet
The New South Wales Government has introduced several initiatives to stop contraband getting into prisons they said last Friday. But under the guise of "stricter rules" the department had also introduced banning all visitors including children from using the toilet unless they terminate their visit at any NSW prison after using the toilet.

Watchdogs slaughtered in NSW
On Tuesday the Carr Government reduced transparency and accountability yet again and New South Wales is in danger of becoming entrenched with cronyism and intimidations with the Carr Labor Government that continues to slaughter the watchdogs.

QLD's Sentence Management

Sentence Management Unit - Wolston Correctional Centre

Brian Rigby, Sharon Gibb, Lorraine Edwards, Alice Mascini, David Armstrong, Debbie Wills, Gary Gray, Michael Williams, Rawinia Te Kanawa, Margaret Bilic.

Tony Rawlins: Half-a-life-time in prison......

QLD: In order to enhance my 'quality of life' at this stage of my 4th incarceration, I submit an application, for inclusion into the Leave of Absence Program.

Some years ago, (in frustration) I intimated that I would be happier to spend the rest of my life in prison! But, since then "I" have realised that "I" am not the only one affected by my decision! There are my family, sisters, brothers, and nieces etc who care and worry about me in my situation.

I am in a position of being a "tragic optimist"; I am optimistic despite of the 'tragic' events in my life. The suffering I have caused to others and the 'pain and guilt I have felt, for 50 years.

I posed the question: - "how can one possibly say 'yes' to a life in prison?"

In spite of my past I can only suppose that 'life' has a potential meaningfulness, under any circumstances. Any situation or condition, no matter how miserable.....

This realisation, presupposed that 'I' have the capacity to reverse the "negatives" into something "creative" in my future. In spite of all that has transpired; into something of a positive structure, with a constructive purpose.

Examining my past has given me an 'insight' into the "human" potential, which permits the turning of suffering into an achievement, And to examine my guilt, finding opportunities to change myself into a 'better' person. (I don't, for one minute, try to say that I'm perfect.....Far from it) but to accept a more responsible outlook, a commitment to action, which 'I' believe is 'equal' to 'rehabilitation'.

For years, my world had become "my body" at the "prison" in which I served my time...That was wrong because a prison is a place that one should strive to be released from.

I was doing the opposite. My only concern, then, was myself; it was selfish, and at the realisation, I came to understand that 'I' should do something about it. Because once an inmate has found a "meaning" he develops a capacity-capability, to 'cope' with the suffering and guilt. The ability to realise "he" is not useless. And loses the feelings of 'emptiness' and meaninglessness.

A strong meaning orientation plays a decisive part in seeking to rehabilitate oneself. Because one can now seek to realise the potential meanings of situations, each and every one of them. To 'actualise' them to the best of his ability-knowledge-and beliefs. Therefore he can become aware 'that it "can" be done in a given situation.

Firstly, by the creation of a 'work plan', before committing himself to 'action'.

Secondly, by experiencing ' that meaning can be found only in work and 'love' of his fellow man. Therefore an inmate, who thinks himself in a hopeless situation, facing odds he can't change, can overcome and expand beyond himself, and by so doing 'change himself' and "turn" 'tragedy' into 'triumph'.

Imprisonment is extraordinarily stressful, nevertheless, one can benefit from the experiences, by using it as a growth experience.

Today I see my life as being abundantly filled with meaning and purpose. Now realising that 'guilt' and suffering of 'incarceration' the growth I now have would not have been. How did this happen? When did it happen?

When a person cannot change the situation that causes the suffering and guilt, can still change his 'attitude'; change his 'choices'; so priorities become (altering the situations causing the suffering) accepting and analysing the guilt, and the reason for it! Altering the personality and outlook toward the guilt situations.

Removing and safeguarding against the causes and avoiding the situation, in my approach to life - to where I can 'safely' say, "I can live in an outside community without any personal 'fear' of breaching the 'moral' codes of the laws of a higher power gives 'meaning and purpose to human life, and the earths' greatest treasures lies in 'human personality."

It was by coming to realise that the 'pain' I now felt and the 'shame' was the "quantity" and "capacity" to also 'love', to feel 'joy' and to have compassion and empathy,

NB; -' A person should be 'judged' on who he is now and not who or 'what' he was, 50 years ago...............!

Tony still seeking release after half a lifetime 'inside'

WHEN Tony Rawlins was locked away for life; trams were still running in Brisbane. City Hall was the tallest building on the skyline and Joh Bjelke-Petersen was a little known Opposition backbencher.

QLD INDEFINITE DETENTION 'IN A NUTSHELL'

In Queensland prison sentences have become step-by-step more lengthy over the last decade according to prisoner Mr David Minty who has been in jail for 20 years.

Corrected or Corrupted

A psychiatrist from the prison Mental Health Team attached to Queensland Health made the comment that 25 per cent of inmates suffer from a diagnosed mental illness.

Indefinite detention means the government owns its citizens

A convicted rapist detained indefinitely in a north Queensland jail has lost a High Court appeal against his detention. Robert John Fardon was due for release more than a year ago but remains in custody under controversial Queensland legislation.

By Tony Rawlins 7 June 05

Ed: The High Court has considered the scope of indefinite detention in another case that of, Fardon v Attorney General [2004] HCA 46 ('Fardon'). Fardon was a case where the majority (Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne, Callinan & Heydon JJ; Kirby J dissenting) upheld the constitutionality of the Dangerous Prisoners (sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) ('2003 Qld Act') The 2003 Qld Act permitted preventative detention of convicted sexual offenders who fulfilled various criteria established by the 2003 Qld Act. The majority in Fardon distinguished the 2003 Qld Act which was constitutional according to a very conservative High Court.

The majority in Fardon held that preventative detention legislation enacted by a Parliament is not inevitably or necessarily unconstitutional even though it means that the Government owns its citizens. Along side Mental health legislation, quarantine legislation, public health emergencies legislation, migration legislation are examples of preventative detention legislation which have a long history of being accepted as valid legislation. The 2003 Qld Act did not apply just to a single named person. The Qld Act applies more generally in respect of any person who is actually serving a sentence for sexual offences of which he or she has been convicted in Queensland.

Related:

Corrected or Corrupted
A psychiatrist from the prison Mental Health Team attached to Queensland Health made the comment that 25 per cent of inmates suffer from a diagnosed mental illness.

ICOPA XI International Conference on Penal Abolition
We are excited to announce that ICOPA X1, the eleventh International Conference on Penal Abolition will happen in Tasmania, Australia from February 9 - 11,2006. Please pass this onto all networks.

Prison boom will prove a social bust
Hardened criminals are not filling NSW's prisons - the mentally ill and socially disadvantaged are, writes Eileen Baldry.

The prison system requires assiduous oversight
As NSW Attorney General Bob Debus noted in 1996: "The kinds of complaints which occur in the system may seem trivial to outsiders but in the superheated world of the prison, such issues can produce explosive results."

Crime and Punishment
Mark Findlay argues that the present psychological approach to prison programs is increasing the likelihood of re-offending and the threat to community safety.

Indefinite detention means the government owns its citizens
A convicted rapist detained indefinitely in a north Queensland jail has lost a High Court appeal against his detention. Robert John Fardon was due for release more than a year ago but remains in custody under controversial Queensland legislation.

Sentencing: Violent crime and practical outcomes
In addition introducing restorative justice programs giving the offender a chance to interact with the offended person if they wish and visa-versa. People are not "dogmatic" therefore should be given a second chance opposed to Life means Life!

Government justice not personal justice
Mr Brett Collins of Justice Action said, "Victims should be looked after properly by implementing restorative justice measures and victims should be compensated for their pain and suffering. " However prisoners are entitled to serve their sentences in peace and privacy as well."

Escape proof but not so the prisoners mind
Fewer prisoners escape from prison these days because they're "cemented in" by materials that do not break and by legislation that can keep prisoners in jail until they die.

He has an active ministry in prison

Dr Gordon Moyes Superintendent Wesley Mission & Part of the Prime Minister's Community Business Partnership?

Bronson Blessington: was the youngest person to be sentenced to life imprisonment since the transportation ended in 1840.

CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEEDURE) AMENDMENT (EXISTING LIFE SENTENCES) BILL

Second Reading

The Hon. Tony Kelly: (Minister for Rural Affairs, Minister for Local Government, Minister for Emergency Services, and Minister for Lands) The Government has continually stated that it would protect the community forever from never-to-be-released prisoners.

The Government has in the past amended sentencing legislation to make it perfectly clear that not withstanding the provisions of the 1989 legislation, in the case of a very small number of offenders where the courts had previously recommended that an offender should never be released, that recommended should be enforced.

A recent decision of the Supreme Court in R v Blessington has held that an offender with a section 13A application that was pending as at 8 May 1997 is not subject to the present rules for redetermination.

The decision also canvassed the possibility that Blessington (and by extension, any others who have not yet had their application determined) might now be able to appeal the sentencing court's recommendations that they never be released. They would therefore be excluded from the application of the current regime for redetermination of those never to released offenders.

The Government believes that the intention of the legislation past by this Parliament was clear.

We have sought advice from the Solicitor General, who has advised that there is some prospect of a successful appeal.

But the people of NSW, and the Balding family, deserve certainty. Both the Solicitor General and the Director of Public Prosecutions believe that the best way to deliver that certainty and remove ambiguity is through an appropriate legislative amendment.

This will ensure that the current regime works uniformly and that all never to be released prisoners will:

* not be eligible to have their sentence redetermined until they have served at least 30 years;

* if a non-parole period is fixed on a redetermination, the offender may not receive a fixed term; and

* that where a non-parole period is fixed on a redetermination, parole cannot be granted except where the offender is in imminent danger of dying (or is incapacitated to the extent that he or she no longer has the physical ability to do harm to any person) and has demonstrated that he or she does not pose a risk to the community.

The amendments proposed in schedule 2 ensure that section 15A of the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 applies to a 'never to be released' offender regardless of whether the non-release recommendation has been quashed, set aside, or called into question.

The amendments remove any possible ambiguity in relation to the application of the law in respect of any particular offender.

The Hon David Clarke: This bill, which is supported by the Opposition, amends the Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 so as to overcome the effect of the decision given on15 April 2005 in the case of Blessington v The Queen, thereby achieving the Government's commitment to keep Bronson Blessington, and people like him, indefinitely locked up. The background circumstances are that in 1990 Bronson Blessington, then aged 14, was convicted of the abduction, sexual assault and murder of Janine Balding.

As a result in sentencing legislation passed in 1989, offenders serving life sentences could apply to the court after eight years for a defined sentence with a minimum and additional term. In more recent years amendments to sentencing legislation relating to inmates subject to a non-release recommendation have been introduced which provide that the period before which an application for a redetermination application could be made was at least 30 years.

When the Minister for Police, Mr Whelan, introduced the Sentencing Legislation Further Amendment Bill in 1997 he described Blessington as representing "pure evil".

Reverend the Hon. Dr Gordon Moyes: I speak on behalf of the Christian Democratic Party on the Crimes (Sentencing Procedures) Amendment (Existing Life Sentences) Bill. These amendments seek to ensure that the current regime for redetermination of existing life sentences of "never to be released" offenders extends to all those offenders whose original sentences have not been redetermined, and applies to those offenders even if theoriginal non-release recommendations are now appealed. I commend the bill to the House.

I acknowledge that the Hon. Peter Breen knows more about Bronson Blessington than anybody in this Chamber because of his close professional association with him.

However, I take Beverly Balding's point that Bronson was capable of knowing the difference between right and wrong.

I took calls over a long period of time on talk back radio and I found not one comment from the community at large in support of Bronson Blessington's early release. By the age of 14 he had been sexually abused by four adult males, was a street kid, an alcoholic, a petrol sniffer, and basically uncontrollable. I have been informed on good, reliable authority from those who work within the prison system that when he became a Christian in 1990 his life very dramatically changed.

In his speech the member for Wagga Wagga, Mr Daryl Maguire, referred to some comments made by Beverly Balding, the mother of Janine Balding.

"Although Blessington was 14 (one month off 15 years of age), he was an uncontrollable child, and had been on the streets for quite some time before he and the others took part in Janine's horrific rape and murder. There is no excuse whatsoever for what they did, and they were all old enough to know right from wrong."

Over the past 14 years or so his Christian life has made Bronson and outstanding model prisoner. He has said that the Lord has led him to lead more than 580 Bible studies within prison yards, with an attendance well over 5,500 prisoners. I commend him on the step that he has taken to invite Christ into his life. Staff of mine from Wesley Mission, who go within the prison system, speak most highly of his complete change of life through his Christian commitment.

His Christian witness in prison will continue to be powerful witness of the power of Christ to change people. If Blessington is preaching to prisoners, I would encourage him to keep on doing so. But can he continue to be a Christian in gaol? That is what Jesus Christ, the apostle Paul, the apostles Peter and John, and a million other twentieth century Christians have done.

I wish Mr Blessington well in his continuing experience as a Christian within gaol. The Hon Dr Arthur Chesterfield Evens: The result is that if an appeal against this bill were made to the High Court by Blessington, the appeal would be ruled against, as occurred in Baker v The Queen.

It therefore falls to the member of this Parliament to override the courts if we will. That is a sad state of affairs. I do not believe I have sufficient knowledge to overrule the courts. I think it is extraordinarily arrogant of us to be voting on a bill such as this when we have heard not a thing from Blessington.

The Hon Peter Breen: Not a word.

The Hon Dr Arthur Chesterfield Evens: Despite these circumstances, we are asked to overrule the courts as if they are nothing. I repeat this is a sad state of affairs. If past this bill will retrospectively take away the right of this prisoner to have his sentence redetermined. We are overriding the courts. On what do we base any such decision? Not on serious knowledge, I put to the honourable members of this House.

No-one doubts the abhorrence of the events surrounding the death of Janine Balding, and no-one doubts that Blessington was guilty. I note the comments of the Reverend the Hon Dr Gordon Moyes, who spoke about the fact that Bronson Blessington has turned to Christ and that people within the gaol system have noticed an immense change in him.

I was rather surprised in that circumstance Reverend the Hon. Dr Gordon Moyes did not say he would forgive Blessington. I had thought from the way the honourable member spoke that he might have come to that position. Indeed from my recollection of the Bible, Jesus Christ forgave sinners on the cross.

Reverend the Hon. Dr Gordon Moyes did not express such forgiveness; rather, he pointed to public opinion expressed to him on talk- back-radio. My own view is that we should not act according to what is said on talk- back-radio. Our job is to lead the country, not follow opinions. We must be aware of opinions heard on talk-back-radio. If we are not, presumably that is at our own peril. We need to do better than that.

The Democrats oppose bills that operate retrospectively against individuals. I believe we do so without detracting from the suffering of the Balding family.

The Hon. Peter Breen: I speak against the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Existing Life Sentences) Bill. All week I have been waiting for the Daily Telegraph to do a story on this bill, the object of which is to keep Bronson Blessington in gaol "forever", to use the word of the Attorney General in the other place. Certainly, that is the Government's intention.

Yesterday I thought the story appeared on page 17 when I read the headline "Dig deep to find the cure for a killer." To my surprise, the article was about heart disease, and seeking donations to the Peter Frilingos appeal.

The headline would have been appropriate for a story about the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Existing Life Sentences) Bill because the Government is digging deep, in fact, that the ground under the Government's feet on this bill is too hot even for the law and order lobby.

The Daily Telegraph has not written one word on the bill. Bronson Blessington was no ordinary offender. When he murdered Janine Balding by drowning her in a dam at Minchinbury in 1988 he was 14 years old with the mental capacity of a 9 year old or 10 year old. His mental condition gave rise to a classic case of diminished responsibility, but the defence was never pleaded at his trial. -- a fact that the trial judge drew attention to in his sentencing remarks.

I wrote to Blessington's lawyers asking them why the defence of diminished responsibility was not raised, and they could not recall. Indeed, they could not recall any discussions about the issue of diminished responsibility.

The sentencing judge also observed that the mental condition affecting Bronson Blessington was a temporary disorder of adolescence, and that the boy had good prospects of recovery.

Indeed, the judge also observed that the boy was already making excellent progress towards rehabilitation in juvenile detention while he was awaiting trial.

Sentencing judges make those kinds of observations all the time. Sometimes they are prophetic; at other times what they predict turns out to be quite wrong. In the case of Bronson Blessington, everything the sentencing judge said turned out to be true. The boy recovered from his temporary mental disorder, he did well in rehabilitation and, as Reverend the Hon. Dr Gordon Moyes pointed out, at age 17 Blessington converted to Christianity while he was still in juvenile detention. He studied by correspondence at theMoore Theological College.

Reverend the Hon. Fred Nile: He has a ministry in prison.

The Hon Peter Breen: He has an active ministry in prison. I cannot imagine anyone else being in a position to approach prisoners in the way he does. He goes out into the yard with his Bible and says, "Anyone for scripture?"

People gather around; it is an extraordinary ministry. Bronson Blessington is living proof that children who make mistakes literally grow out of their problems, that juvenile offenders can be rehabilitated and that giving people a second chance is a sentencing principle that lies at the heart of a justice system that evolved from a penal colony. These are the reasons the legislation before the House today did not get a run in the Daily Telegraph. [this week 5 May 2005].

Bronson Blessington was the youngest person to be sentenced to life imprisonment since the transportation ended in 1840.

Murder committed in New South Wales prior to 1990 carried a life sentence unless the trial judge was satisfied that mitigating circumstances significantly diminished the prisoner's culpability for the crime. In practice a life sentence did not mean natural life as a prisoner could apply to the Supreme Court after eight years to convert the life sentence to a fixed term.

Approximately 250 lifers indicted before 1990 have applied for fixed- term sentences to replace their life sentences, and so far 225 of them have been successful. In 1990 the average life sentence served for murder was 15 years.

As part of its tougher approach to crime and punishment, the Government changed the law in 1990. To what is called truth in sentencing legislation of 1989. Which came into effect on 12 January 1990. As a result of that legislation, a life sentence now means for the term of a prisoner's natural life.

I have a longstanding interest in Bronson Blessington and his convicted co-offender, Stephen "Shorty" Jamieson, who was a victim of foetal alcohol syndrome and a person who was almost certainly innocent of the crimes for which he stands convicted. It was a bizarre case of mistaken identity. Both Blessington and Jamieson have now served 16.5 years in prison.

The bill before the House is directed solely directed at Bronson Blessington, who made a successful application before Justice Dunford in the Supreme Court and judgement was delivered on 15 April 2005.

It seemed to me that this young man had paid for his crimes and deserved a second chance to give something back to society. Bronson Blessington was partly raised by his paternal grandparents, Mat and John Blessington, who were field officers for the Salvation Army.

Visiting the child prisoner, initially at the juvenile detention centres and later in the adult prisons, Mat Blessington and Jack Begnall became good friends, and today they are both resolute and forthright men -- even at over 70 years of age -- praying ceaselessly for the salvation of Bronson. The assistant pastor reminded me that Christianity is tailor made for prisoners, offering them hope. Jesus Christ himself was a prisoner, as Reverend the Hon. Dr Gordon Moyes has pointed out. He was despised, a man of sorrows, familiar with suffering, and one from whom we avert our gaze, to paraphrase the prophet Isaih.

Jack said. "God forgives even the greatest sinners, and this is the liberating power of Christianity. Many prisoners who previously had no knowledge of God and led aimless lives find their liberation in prison through the gift of faith. I suggest to the assistant pastor that many inmates who have suffered injustice and oppression identify with the counter-cultural and revolutionary Jesus who lurks at the heart of Christianity."

Prosecution and defence lawyers have opposing tasks; one seeks a conviction and the other seeks an acquittal. Police assist the prosecution and play a critical role in deciding what will be investigated and how the evidence is presented to juries, for the most part, are kept in the dark about the bargaining that goes on between the prosecution and the defence over the evidence.

But when it comes to sentencing the judge, as sole arbiter of the fate of a prisoner, ought to have the benefit of all of the facts, and those facts ought to form the basis of the prisoner's sentence. That is one of the problems with Parliament deciding sentences. We have to do it in the context of a debate. How can we make a judgment about the life of a person without getting the facts?

A psychiatrist, Dr Clark said the youth suffered from "a conduct disorder of adolescence", a defined medical condition in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association. The psychiatrist concluded that the boy suffered from an abnormality of mind "which was present at the time of the offence" and "fits the criteria for a defence of diminished responsibility".

After quoting the report Justice Newman said, "I might add this defence was at no stage raised during the course of the trial". In the very next sentence he observed that the condition diagnosed by the psychiatrist is transient and the good doctor expected it to be resolved in time.

The Judge said, "On the basis of this Dr Clark held out the strong hope that the boy Blessington is capable of being rehabilitated". Then the judge referred to the reports from the Department of Youth and Community Services indicating Bronson had already made "excellent progress" in the juvenile detention centre while awaiting trial.

This was when Bronson was 17.

By God 21 May 05

Related:

Putting your Family First?

(This following link has now been removed from gov't website now updated 18 April 2009.)

The Prime Minister's Community Business Partnership

"Working in partnership not only has the potential to enrich people's lives but can also deliver tangible results for all Australians. Community and business partnerships are a driver to accomplish better outcomes than any group acting alone could achieve."

The Hon. John Howard, MP, the Prime Minister of Australia and Reverend The Hon. Dr Gordon Moyes AC, MLC Superintendent Wesley Mission?

Photo Source: Reverend The Hon. Dr Gordon Moyes AC, MLC Superintendent Wesley Mission from that site.

However, some of that material now posted on another website without the photos:

Prime Minister's Community Business Partnership

Related Links:

PETITION
To Her Excellency the Honourable Marie Bashir, AC, Governor of New South Wales. WHEREAS, under the Royal prerogative of mercy Your Excellency has discretion to grant a pardon to a convicted offender. WHEREAS, Bronson Matthew Blessington was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment on 18 September 1990. At the time of committing the offence Bronson Blessington was a juvenile aged 14 years and he is the youngest person sentenced to life imprisonment in New South Wales since transportation ended in 1840.

Bronson Blessington: Testimony from my prison cell
Before my conversion in 1990 I was completely illiterate, extremely fearful of all adults due to the fact, I had been sexually abused by four adult males. I lived in a fantasy world, crying out for someone to love me and looking for somewhere to belong. By the age of 14 I was an alcoholic and a petrol sniffer and basically uncontrollable. I only write this so you have some idea of where I was at when God reached deep into my soul and washed me clean with the blood of Christ.

NSW Prisoner speaks out
Hello my name is Bronson Blessington. I am writing this letter to you in the hope that you will be able to give me some assistance. I have been in prison now for 15 and 1/2 years. I was given a life sentence when I was 14 years old.

QLD INDEFINITE DETENTION 'IN A NUTSHELL'

Queensland Labor Attorney-General Rod Welford 'Indefinite Detention'

In Queensland prison sentences have become step-by-step more lengthy over the last decade according to prisoner Mr David Minty who has been in jail for 20 years.

The introduction of new legislative policy to keep prisoners indefinitely can mean we are never to be released. These changes will have an effect on my sentence and I can now expect to die behind bars.

Because I have been unable to establish strong ties in the 'outside' community my category of prisoner will come under the proposed policy that will not be granted parole.

The Queensland Attorney-General Rod Welford has taken the unusual steps by taking sex offenders to court right at the time of their release and making sure the keys were thrown away.

There were others before, that during sentencing, the Attorney-General took 'leave' of the Sentencing Court and asked for an 'indefinite Sentence' to be handed down, and which a number of felons received. Both these categories of prisoners are 'locked in' to a regime of 'never to be released'.

Several more categories of prisoners are now being targeted.

Queensland defies U.N. conventions by retaining mandatory sentences of ' life means life' for the offence of murder.

Legislations increase the number of offences able to carry a 'life sentence'. One such legislation in the early nineteen-nineties was for a hardcore-drug offence and gave new meaning to mandatory but only for that category of sentencing.

Those convicted under that 'Act' were given 'mandatory life-sentences' and it did mean; never to be released from prison. That was repealed several years later.

It could be argued that news only carries reports of lenient sentencing or early release of felons and never shows that these circumstances are extremely exceptional and not usually the rule. The whimsical (or manipulative) policies of prison administration distort the 'long-term sentenced' prisoners' sentences.

My sentence plan history has been rewritten with little regard that it was an abuse of process and therefore unlawful to do so.

He says there are devices such as an 'Offender Risk Needs Inventory' a questionnaire that is in many cases implemented in a capricious and deceptive fashion; and with much secrecy; and my evidence is that my score dramatically rose in a space of 2 years without any good reason.

A judge obligated to hand down a mandatory sentence to a person convicted of murder has no discretion; legislation dictates there is no alternative other than handing down a 'life sentence'. This was once referred to as an 'Indefinite sentence' but became 'Indeterminate sentence' when the so-call 'Serious Dangerous Offenders Bill' was being enacted becoming a separate category where felons would be convicted under the 'Act' (Penalties and Sentences Act section 172) and be sentenced to a statute 'Indefinite Sentence'.

Where 'Indefinite' was reserved for the worst of the worst offences, the mandatory 'life-sentences' a judge delivered were hardly ever intended that the prisoner would not be granted parole after a considerable time. That is if the prisoner showed redeeming merits and was rehabilitated or habilitated (taught how to live).

'Queensland Community Corrections Board' (Parole Board) the authority who would give parole to 'long-term - sentenced' prisoners is in March 2005 closing down its 'Release to Work Centres' which used to trial prisoners as a staging-post before being paroled.

Elsewhere in the system 'Leave of Absences' have become almost nonexistent for prisoners to re-establish community ties. Once a prisoner could achieve a day leave program. 'leave' to be with family or a suitable sponsor for a day every month, near the completion of the custodial segment of a sentence. Now, there are very few prisoners on prison farms receiving ' leave' now, one only at the prison farm 'Numinbah'.

It is proposed that in June 2005 'Indeterminate sentenced' prisoners', generally the most changed and benevolent prisoners, will not be given parole if they don't have strong community ties such as family to go back to. Therefore disadvantaged prisoners who have lost all contact out in the community after 15 to 20 years have lost many opportunities and will 'fall through the cracks' buried, remain in jail, institutionalised, indefinitely.

It is cruel and unusual punishment (not having a sentence defined) and I am applying to the Supreme Court for relief (from being denied 'natural justice'), A previous action I took was heard on 31 October 2002, under the 'Penalties and Sentences Act 1992' Section 171(1)(a) ' Application to Review Sentence'. I attempted to point out to the court that 'Indefinite ' and 'Indeterminate' meant the same and instead of coming under an unaccountable parole board and that I should have the benefits of applying to the court as an 'Indefinite - sentenced' prisoner and have my merits weighed by a court.

Prisoners would not need to be seeking help or to have their 'rights' confirmed from a court if Queensland followed other States and set-up 'Merits Review Tribunal'.

I conclude with a bit of witticism and a degree of cynicism that the Queensland public can be assured that the public servants are ensuring that taxes are being increasingly spent on making a vast and monumental infrastructure and permanently banishing outcasts from society.

They're not afraid of the law as they believe they are the law, and often manipulate legislation, and will do what is necessary by stealth if need be.

Politicians have opted for the soft-option and have abandoned recycling - rehabilitation. It's all a bit like the 'Transportation' policy when Britain exiled the forefathers to this great free nation of ours, Australia.

By David Minty 16 February 05

In Other Developments:

KERRY O'BRIEN: Law and order has become the hobby horse of state politicians around the country in response to a public perception - rightly or wrongly - that violent crime is on the increase?

DR DON WEATHERBURN: Most of the error in judging crime trends comes from a general tendency to think crime is rising when it is actually stable or falling.

JUSTICE ACTION: Actually violent crime is not on the increase and statistics say its been stable over the last decades.

Now the Queensland Government has a law that would allow the indefinite detention of dangerous prisoners beyond their full sentence, if they're deemed to pose a threat to society on release.

JUSTICE ACTION: But more importantly if the QLD Department of Corrective Services fail to give the prisoners programs and instead punish the prisoners throughout the term of their sentence then the department failed the community.

PETER MCCUTCHEON: If you do the crime, you serve the time. But, in Queensland, that time may be stretched out indefinitely to prevent possible crimes in the future.

A 54-year-old multiple rapist, Robert John Fardon, is the first prisoner to face the Queensland Government's draconian pre-emptive imprisonment laws.

JUSTICE ACTION: What did the taxpayers pay for at $60,000 dollars a year for 14 years that's $840,000 dollars?

PETER MCCUTCHEON: The government wants him to remain behind bars, despite having completed a 14-year jail term.

JUSTICE ACTION: If you take your car to the panel beater to fix a damaged panel and they return the car to you written off do you pay for the repairs?

ROD WELFORD, QUEENSLAND ATTORNEY-GENERAL: At the end of the day, the balance we've struck is that it's safer to detain these people pending a review of their capacity to make it outside prison rather than everyone else in the community locking themselves up to protect themselves from them.

JUSTICE ACTION: But in the grand scheme of things the balance you struck was to make taxpayers pay you for your mistakes. In this case you had this person in your care for 14 years and ended up with a write off, after you've been paid to rehabilitate prisoners.

Then after you have failed to do your job you want taxpayers to continue to pay for your failures why? Why hasn't the standard of a human being been lowered in over 200 years? Have people suddenly developed bad genes and cannot learn?

PETER MCCUTCHEON: This radical new approach to crime prevention is under challenge, sparking a new debate about security and liberty.

CATHY PEREIRA, PRISONERS' LEGAL SERVICE: We think that this is a law that fundamentally undermines the criminal justice system in Australia and it's quite novel in the sense that, for the first time, it's asking the courts to make a guess about whether a person is going to commit a criminal offence in the future.

HETTY JOHNSTON, BRAVEHEARTS: What's happening here is we're just pussy footing around. If what we're trying to do is to protect the community, protect innocent children, then let's do it. And, if that means turning the law over on its head, then let's do that too.

JUSTICE ACTION: Yes but you don't protect the community by lowering the standards of a human being because the QLD Department of Corrective Services failed to implement proper programs in prison.

Why wasn't there an 'independent' inquiry to find out the facts of Fardon's incarceration? Was this man delivered the programs or was he blocked because of the Departments discrimination and treatment? So before legislation is radically changed and before we lower the standards of a human being we should have first found out the facts of his incarceration and what this man was offered in prison.

PETER MCCUTCHEON: Earlier this year, the Beattie Government was severely embarrassed when it had to make an 11th-hour bid to ensure a notorious paedophile - Dennis Raymond Ferguson - was released from jail on the condition he report to police.

PETER MCCUTCHEON: At the height of the controversy, the Beattie Government announced new laws to detain the state's most dangerous prisoners'. Ten months later, with a state election in the offing, the State Supreme Court is being asked to apply these laws for the first time.

In some ways, Fardon is an ideal test case.The Supreme Court this week was told that on at least four occasions Fardon said he would kill or commit a crime to return to jail rather than face the daunting prospect of reintegrating into society?

But there's an added complication - the court has also been told Fardon was apparently a model prisoner, and today in court he apologised to his victims, pledging not to re-offend. Prison rights advocates say more resources should be put into helping prisoners settle into life outside, not locking them away.

CATHY PEREIRA: By warehousing one person or two people or perhaps a small group of people, that does not do anything overall for the community, to protect the community. If we're looking at community protection, then put the resources into the community.

PETER MCCUTCHEON: So you see it as a token gesture for political purposes?

CATHY PEREIRA: Absolutely. It's a token gesture.

PETER MCCUTCHEON: The Prisoners' Legal Service says these laws are ultimately about trying to protect the government from embarrassment should a dangerous prisoner re-offend. Do you concede these laws are politically convenient?

ROD WELFORD: Well, it's not just the government that's embarrassed if serious violent sex offenders are released from prison and re-offend. We've had prisoners who've been released from prison and re-offended within weeks.

JUSTICE ACTION: Ultimately these laws are also about protecting the government from admitting their failure when they haven't provided any programs to the prisoners at $60,000 dollars of taxpayers money a year and in Fardon's case that ends up being $840,000 dollars? In addition to that the cost of keeping him in jail and many others indefinitely will be incredible,

PETER MCCUTCHEON: The Dangerous Prisoners Act requires the court to determine whether there's a high degree of probability of a prisoner re-offending. Criminologist and psychologist Dr Stephen Smallbone says, from a scientific perspective, that could be unworkable.

DR STEPHEN SMALLBONE, CRIMINOLOGIST, GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY: If we put everybody who is in custody at the moment in Queensland for a sexual offence against the child together, we could be fairly sure that a certain percentage of those will commit new sex offences.

The problem is that, if we just then look at that particular subgroup of high-risk offenders, we're going to get it wrong about 25 per cent to 30 per cent of the time.

ROD WELFORD: I know that there's a nice academic argument going on about the potential for prediction about whether someone will re-offend. But the people we're talking about already have a track record and commonsense and close interaction with these people will give people with skills the capacity to make a reasonable assessment, in my view.

PETER MCCUTCHEON: Child rights advocates like Hetty Johnston from Bravehearts also have little time for the problems of predicting criminal behaviour.

HETTY JOHNSTON: We're saying there IS going to be a balance here and it's a risk - what if they don't re-offend, what if they do? In the balance is children and children's entire lives and families' entire lives and we say you have to balance that up in the best interests of the child, not in the best interests of the offender.

JUSTICE ACTION: But who's ultimately responsible for not delivering appropriate programs in prison? Who is placing children at further risk by not ensuring that prisoners get programs instead of punishment?

CATHY PEREIRA: We have to keep in mind that the only thing between ourselves and arbitrary detention is the law. If we undermine that, then it undermines the protection that is available to every citizen.

PETER MCCUTCHEON: Whatever the Supreme Court decides, the debate will continue. Fardon's legal team has lodged special leave to appeal to the High Court, arguing the Queensland legislation breaches the separation of powers under Australia's Constitution.

ROD WELFORD: There's no doubt that any law that provides for the continuing detention of a person beyond the period of their defined sentence for a particular offence will be controversial and subject to legal debate. I'm happy for that legal debate to occur, and I'm happy for the matter to be ventilated in the High Court. The High Court ultimately will determine the outcome.

Related:

Indefinite detention means the government owns its citizens
A convicted rapist detained indefinitely in a north Queensland jail has lost a High Court appeal against his detention. Robert John Fardon was due for release more than a year ago but remains in custody under controversial Queensland legislation.

Tony still seeking release after half a lifetime inside
After serving imprisonment continually since February of 1956, because of his age 74, he suffers from high blood pressure, angina, has survived a mild stroke and two major strokes in the past few years, leading to mobility problems on gradients and he continues to have irregular heart problems.

'Lifers' swap cells for nursing beds
A MURDERER and a child molester each judged too dangerous to ever be free of the prison system have been paroled to ordinary nursing homes where other residents have not been told about their pasts. Child sex offender Phillip Adamson and murderer Percy David Bond, who were both in poor health, were moved in recent weeks. Both have spent more than 30 years in jail and both were sentenced under conditions that mean they will never technically be released.

Villawood detainees go on hunger strike

A refugee advocacy group says up to 200 detainees at the Villawood Detention Centre, in Sydney, have begun a hunger strike to draw attention to their situation ahead of the federal election.

A spokesman says the strike began on Tuesday night and is expected to continue until Saturday.

Refugee Action Coalition spokesman Ian Rintoul says immigration detention featured strongly in the last federal election but he says many detainees in Villawood feel they have been forgotten this time.

Mr Rintoul says while most of the detainees are being held for breaching their visa conditions he says they face the same issues as asylum seekers.

"People can spend very long periods in detention without any sort of obvious remedies, their families can be separated," he said.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Immigration says about 370 detainees in Villawood are not attending the centre's dining room for meals.

But she says it is difficult to tell whether people are eating because food is available in more than one area in the centre. She says the department is monitoring the situation.

By Just Us 7 October 04

Related:

Afghan children lose High Court battle against detention
Lawyers have lost their constitutional challenge to the detention of four children at a South Australian immigration centre. Four siblings from Afghanistan, aged between seven and 15, have been in detention since they arrived in Australia in 2001.

Democrats to keep up pressure over asylum seekers
The Australian Democrats will maintain their pressure on the next federal government over Australia's treatment of asylum seekers, if the party can retain its strength in the Senate.

Children overboard continues to haunt PM like the plague...
John Howard's lack of integrity and morality will be under question "again" today after Labor seized on claims that a Liberal Senator called Scumbo Howard a 'lying rodent'.

Apologise to children abused in care: report
A Senate report on children placed in institutional care has called for the Federal Government to apologise to those who were harmed by their experience.

Australian Govt human rights record 'worsening'
Community groups have given the Federal Government five out of ten for its record on human rights this year. Mr Purcell said the Government was also marked down because of the policy of holding children in immigration detention centres.

Don't rock the Boat Howard!
PRIME Minister John Howard today denied the children overboard affair had swayed the 2001 election? Mr Howard has spent the week defending himself against claims he had been informed that nobody in Defence believed children had been thrown overboard by asylum seekers.

Australia an unfair nation, say young and all!
Young people and older people think Australia is undemocratic and unfair. Young people cite their teachers as having the greatest influence on their political thinking, according to a provocative new national survey funded by the Government. Older people cite "injustice" amongst other things as a "bent legal system" favouring hi profiled superstars, corporations and politicians.

Not happy, John
Valder's alarm whistle effort 'let love be thy weapon' indeed Prime Minister John Howard is also the subject of a stinging attack in a Sunday feature this week, from the man who first engineered his ascent to the Liberal leadership in the mid-1980s former party president John Valder.

Aide reveals children overboard advice
A former federal ministerial adviser has revealed that he told Prime Minister John Howard before the 2001 federal election that no children had been thrown overboard from a boat carrying asylum seekers in Australian waters.

Gillard stirs Liberal leadership pot
Mr Costello yesterday said that the Federal Government should aim to get all children out of immigration detention and he suggested there should be an increase in immigration levels.

Here is a new project
1. Do you believe it is right to imprison innocent children?
2. Do you believe it is right to imprison innocent women?
3. Do you believe it is right to imprison innocent people?

Compo claims could follow child detention, group warns
A refugee group has predicted a string of compensation claims, after the Human Rights Commission found numerous and repeated breaches of the UN convention on the rights of the child in immigration detention.

Child detention breaches UN convention: human rights report
A leaked final draft report by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) is calling for urgent changes to Australia's immigration detention laws.

Report recommends freeing child detainees
The Human Rights Commission has found that some children held in Australia's immigration detention centres have been exposed to cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment.

No more children for Baxter, pleads SA
The South Australian Government is urging the Commonwealth not to shift any more children into the Baxter detention centre in the state's north.

Nauru staff 'fear children are next'
Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone says women and children are sitting in on a hunger strike at the Nauru detention centre, but are not participating.