People without a voice are not people in any meaningful sense of the word. Silenced people cannot express their ideas; they can neither consent nor protest. They are reduced to being pawns in the schemes of the powerful, mendicants who must accept whatever is imposed upon them. In order to keep people in a state of subjugation, silencing their voices is essential. Nowhere is this clearer than in U.S. prisons.Prisoners are silenced in many ways. One of the major vehicles of the latest campaign to silence prisoners in the United States is the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (PLRA).
This law, which has been declared unconstitutional by several U.S. District Court judges but upheld on appeal, is helping to reverse the last 30 years of progress in giving prisoners a voice and is moving the nation still further away from democracy. Anyone who cares about the reactionary direction of politics in the United States needs to pay attention to the PLRA.
When Attorney General John Ashcroft was a U.S. senator, he advocated that other state and local institutions adopt the premises and procedures of this law. This is exactly what is happening today.
To put the PLRA into its appropriate context, it is necessary to briefly review the 20th century history of incarceration in the United States (details are provided in the author’s article, “U.S. Capitalism and Incarceration Revisited,” Monthly Review, September 2003).
Incarceration rates rose and fell between 1925 and 1974, hitting a peak of 137.1 per 100,000 persons in the Great Depression year of 1939 and averaging 108 per 100,000 over the entire period. Rates reached a low point at the end of the Second World War, rose after the war until 1961, and began to trend sharply downward after 1962, hitting a post-depression low of 94.3 per 100,000 in 1968.
However, since the end of the Vietnam War, incarceration rates have skyrocketed, reaching an all-time high of 478 per 100,000 in 2000. Imprisonment in the United States is now at the highest rate of any country in modern history. At the beginning of 2002, close to two million persons were being held in federal and state prisons and local jails. This unprecedented period of mass incarceration is the setting for the PLRA.
Prior to this upsurge in imprisonment, not much new prison construction had taken place in the United States. The Great Depression witnessed the last major prison construction boom, and the flood of new prisoners that began in the late 1960s overwhelmed these aging facilities. U.S. prisons were quickly overcrowded and substantially understaffed, exposing inmates, [prisoners], to widespread violence, abuse, and neglect.
The Texas Department of Corrections (DOC) offers a good example. By the early 1970s, the state prison system was so overcrowded that some units were operating at 200 percent of capacity with as many as five inmates, [prisoners], to a two-person cell and others sleeping on hallway floors and outside in tents.
The problem of understaffing was addressed by an infamous building tender system in which selected inmates, [prisoners], were used as auxiliary guards. Medical care was grossly inadequate, and meaningful correctional programs were nonexistent. Prison conditions in many states were comparable to those in Texas.
Mass incarceration and overcrowding led to widespread and devastating prison riots and insurrections. Between 1968 and 1971, there were 40 major disturbances, including the historic revolt at Attica Prison in upstate New York, which resulted in 43 deaths.
An accurate estimate of the monetary cost of these prison disturbances is impossible because the bills are still coming due. As recently as August 2000, New York agreed to pay former inmates, [prisoners], of Attica up to $8 million to settle a class-action lawsuit resulting from the excessive use of force against prisoners during the 1971 assault to retake the prison.
Not surprisingly, the explosion in imprisonment produced a parallel trend in prison litigation. In 1972, David Ruiz and other inmates, [prisoners], filed a lawsuit against the Texas DOC seeking relief from the prison conditions noted above. The case was tried six years later, and in 1981 U.S. District Judge William Wayne Justice ruled that confinement in Texas prisons constituted cruel and unusual punishment. He cited brutality by guards, overcrowding, understaffing, use of building tenders, poor medical care, and uncontrolled physical abuse among inmates, [prisoners.]
Similar lawsuits were filed across the country and in increasing numbers. In 1970, some 2,200 civil rights cases were filed in federal courts, from a population of 360,000 inmates, [prisoners.]
By 1995, with a prison population of 1.6 million, nearly 40,000 new lawsuits were filed, about a fifth of the federal courts’ civil docket. In that same year, almost a third of all correctional institutions across the nation were under state or federal court orders to limit prison populations or improve the conditions of confinement for inmates, [prisoners], under their jurisdiction.
By the middle of the 1990s, mass incarceration sparked both legal and penological crises. Despite the largest and most expensive prison-building program in history, correctional facilities continued operating at or above rated capacities, and, consequently, many DOCs remained in violation of court orders and consent decrees. As national and state economic problems mounted, even staunch conservatives were balking at the prospect of more prison expenditures.
It was during the period of economic difficulties in the early 1990s that reactionary politicians drafted the PLRA and railroaded it through Congress. The PLRA grew directly out of the Republican Contract with America, aconservative agenda embracing all aspects of national life.
The PLRA was not covert legislation—it openly addressed specific legal issues and only thinly disguised its reactionary goals. Congressional sponsors of the PLRA, allied with the powerful National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) and the National District Attorneys Association (NDAA), promoted their bill as the answer to alleged inmate litigation abuse.
Senator Orrin Hatch, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced the bill on the Senate floor, proclaiming, “This landmark legislation will help bring relief to a civil justice system overwhelmed by frivolous prisoner lawsuits.” Backers of the legislation launched a propaganda campaign utilizing various “Top Ten Frivolous Filing Lists” that were concocted from the silliest lawsuits that could be located.
These carefully edited lists excluded the four leading topics of correctional-conditions litigation in federal court: physical assaults by correctional staff and other inmates, [prisoners], inadequate medical care, alleged due process violations relating to disciplinary sanctions, and general living conditions claims (for example, nutrition and sanitation).
Conservative senators introduced two of the lists into the Congressional Record, and lobby groups like the Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse circulated these “Top Ten” lists nationwide to rally popular support. In spite of the disinformation campaign and ruthless congressional arm-twisting, the PLRA could not pass as freestanding legislation and had to be included as a rider to an appropriations bill.
The PLRA mandates three procedural changes that have affected inmate, [prisoner], litigation significantly. First, the law imposes filing fees even on indigent inmates, [prisoners.] This provision increases the financial burden on prisoners, most of whom are already poor at the time of their incarceration. Second, the law limits the damages and attorney’s fees that inmates, [prisoners], can receive if they win their cases.
Considering the low percentage of successful inmate, [prisoner], cases and the small monetary damages awarded to plaintiffs, this limitation restricts prisoners’ access to legal representation by making prison litigation financially even less attractive to attorneys than it was prior to the enactment of the PLRA.
Third, and with the greatest impact, the PLRA requires that inmates, [prisoner], exhaust administrative remedies before filing lawsuits. Through this provision, authorities can block lawsuits by issuing complicated grievance procedures, by shortening deadlines, and by adding multiple layers of review.
These procedural reforms have produced the intended results. While the prison population rose steadily between 1970 and 2001, by a phenomenal 574 percent, court filings failed to match this growth trend after passage of the PLRA. Between 1970 and 1995, filings rose by 942 percent, growing considerably faster than total incarcerations. However, in the six-year period immediately following the passage of the act, there was a 43 percent decrease in court filings despite a 23 percent increase in the prison population.
The act has definitely silenced a significant number of voices from the cells. Given the low success rate of inmate, [prisoner], litigation (historically about 15 percent) and the modest money damages actually paid out (in 1993, excluding one multimillion dollar settlement, the mean award was $18,800 and the median was a mere $1,000), one might reasonably ask whether the political effort and expense needed to enact the statute was justified.
However, it is not until we see how the PLRA serves the reactionary agenda for U.S. prisons that we can understand why it is so important to silence inmates, [prisoners.]
There is no doubt that the court judgments and consent decrees of the last 30 years have ameliorated some of the worst conditions and abuses in U.S. prisons. The results have been dramatic and much more expensive than damages awarded to individual inmates, [prisoners.] The case of the Texas DOC is illustrative. The Ruiz lawsuit fundamentally changed the operations of Texas prisons.
In 1981, after a lengthy trial in which 349 witnesses testified about prison conditions and practices, Judge Justice ordered improvements, set deadlines, and appointed a special master to supervise compliance. In 1982, the Texas DOC agreed to discontinue the building tender program and began to hire more guards, significantly expanding the state payroll.
To address the issue of overcrowded and outdated buildings, Texas began a vast prison construction program in the late 1980s, which continued throughout the decade. During the 1990s alone, 70 new prison units were constructed, adding 108,597 beds to the system, and the DOC staff expanded from 22,332 to 40,081.
The Texas DOC operating budget for 1990–1999 was $15.8 billion. This did not include an additional $1.8 billion in prison construction bonds that were passed by voters during the period. But despite these expenditures and because of rising incarceration rates, the Texas prison system continued to operate at or above capacity and was unable to meet many of the court-ordered improvements.
The Texas experience was not unique. The U.S. Department of Justice reported that in 1995 a total of 456 correctional facilities across the nation (31 percent of the total) were under state or federal court order for the totality of conditions, to limit population, or for specific conditions of confinement.
It is in the arena of court orders and consent decrees that the political agenda of the PLRA becomes clear. The PLRA restricts the settlement of prison litigation by consent decree and limits the life span of any court order or consent decree, even existing ones, to two years.
Texas provided an important test case for the new law. In the three years prior to passage of the PLRA, the prison population of Texas increased 142 percent, leading to conditions that clearly violated several restrictions imposed by Judge Justice.
As soon as the PLRA became law, the Texas Attorney General demanded the application of the time limitation of the statute to the Ruiz case. Judge Justice responded by declaring the PLRA unconstitutional, but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed his ruling and remanded the case to him. In 2001, the Ruiz case was settled, and federal oversight of the Texas prison system was terminated.
It should come as no surprise that, with the help of then Governor George W. Bush and his general counsel, members of the Texas Republican congressional delegation drafted key portions of the PLRA dealing with court judgments and decrees and intervened openly in the Ruiz case.
The nationwide impact of the PLRA on court-ordered changes in prison operations has been significant. During the first five years under the new law, the number of state and federal correctional facilities under court order or consent decree was reduced by 22 percent (down to 357 in 2000).
The impact on state prisons was especially significant. Between 1995 and 2000, the number of state prisons under court order to limit prison population dropped from 216 to 119 (45 percent), and orders to relieve crowded conditions were down from 208 to 98 (53 percent).
Court orders affecting prison medical facilities dropped 51 percent. The state of Michigan offers a good example of what is at stake in the medical arena. In 1998, Michigan was appealing two ongoing consent decrees under PLRA, hoping to save money. For the fiscal year 1997–1998, the state budget appropriation dedicated specifically to cover the additional costs of the consent decrees was $100,627,800. Michigan legislators were eager to reclaim this money but were disappointed.
The problem was that 79 percent of this money was spent on mental health care for inmates, [prisoners], and, even if both consent decrees were terminated, the state would still have to continue offering mental health services or risk a new round of litigation if it let psychiatric services deteriorate to a condition which violated the federal rights of prisoners. A fiscal analyst warned legislators that the actual savings from PLRA might be only a paltry $10 million, far less than the annual appropriations for consent decree operations.
The fact that so many prisons have become de facto mental institutions for the poor has, so far, frustrated the purposes of the PLRA in this arena. The restrictions on consent decrees and court judgments in the PLRA have affected inmate, [prisoner], litigation beyond the procedural changes. For example, during the initial five-year period of the law, the number of state facilities under court order to provide library services dropped from 126 to 33.
This was a devastating blow to prison litigators, 95 percent of whom represent themselves and must research and write their own legal papers. Several states have actually closed their law libraries and auctioned the books on eBay for a fraction of their value.
Although the primary targets of the PLRA were the federal and state DOCs, the law has had widespread impact on the local level as well. In direct response to the act, U.S. District Judge Norma L. Shapiro closed the books on Harris v. City of Philadelphia, a jail-overcrowding lawsuit filed in 1982.
She put her reservations about the dictated settlement on record: “It is with some concern that the court will approve this settlement. After eighteen years, the population of the Philadelphia Prison System has nearly doubled.
Although new facilities have been, and are being built, they are immediately filled beyond capacity.” Political conservatives celebrate the PLRA as a victory for the sovereignty of state and local governments and have recommended that states enact similar legislation. So far, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming have done so, and initiatives are underway in several other states.
After the final Ruiz ruling in 2001, one of the members of the Texas Republican congressional delegation proclaimed to his constituency, “We have just won a significant battle against Judge William Wayne Justice in our struggle to regain control over Texas prisons.” Political rhetoric aside, a serious analysis of the PLRA reveals the conservative victory for what it is—a legislative maneuver to raise the ceiling on incarceration and seriously restrict outside control over conditions of confinement in U.S. prisons. This legislation facilitates higher rates of incarceration at lower cost than during the pre-PLRA period with no regard for the human consequences.
And the consequences will be dire—a return to a “hands off” prison policy will reverse the modest gains prisoners have won in the past 30 years and return the system to darker days. Progressive judges, like Justice and Shapiro, who have been monitoring U.S. prisons over these 30 years, already see the problems returning, but because of the PLRA they are powerless to intervene.
The PLRA is clearly a political vehicle for the powerful to continue using incarceration as a solution to the economic and social dislocations produced by postindustrial capitalism.
The boast of “taking back the prisons” is a thin smokescreen for mass incarceration and intensified repression in the criminal justice system, [çriminal law system.] Through the PLRA, the political right is silencing the voices of prisoners and tightening the hold of reactionaries on the machinery of government.
The PLRA, following 30 years of liberal judicial intervention in U.S. prisons, is a prime example of Marx’s observation that reform in the bourgeois state, including prison reform, is always reform by the bourgeoisie for the bourgeoisie.
The PLRA illustrates for us the important lesson that bourgeois prison reform must never be confused with the revolutionary prison reform that will render the prison system we know today a grotesque relic of human history.
The history and impact of the PLRA is both instructive and alarming—there are more of these reforms on the reactionary agenda for the United States. They target everything from court- ordered education for special needs children and shelter for the homeless to legal attacks on citizen access to the courts and the fundamental right of habeas corpus in order to make the death penalty more “effective.” Make no mistake about it. The political assault by conservatives on the poor and working people is in full swing.
By Richard D. Vogel edited by Gregory Kable posted 24 May 2004
Richard D. Vogel is an independent socialist writer. He is currently working on a history of the U.S. conquest and exploitation of the Mexican people.
Related:
USA: An ugly prison record
US: For a nation founded on slavery and genocide, Americans retain an astonishingly enduring faith in their continuing righteousness. They are sounding this note again as the prison torture scandal continues in Iraq.
From Terrell Unit in Texas to Abu Ghraib Doesn't It Ring a (Prison) Bell If the president wasn't so forthright about his disinterest in the world, it would have been hard to believe him Wednesday when he said the abuse in Abu Ghraib prison "doesn't represent the America I know." But being stripped, hooded and urinated on while your friend is forced to masturbate next to you? The only member of the Bush clan who knows about that kind of thing is Jenna.
Restorative Justice Practices
This is part one in a series of articles about restorative justice practices of Native American, First Nation and other indigenous people of North America. Part one of this series includes inter- views with three justice practitioners of the southwestern United States:
USA: Problems, blame abound in prison system
A correctional officer, [guard], watches over the central exercise yard at Folsom State Prison. California built 21 prisons and tripled prison staff as the statewide inmate, [prisoner], population grew in the '80s and '90s.
Mistreatment of Prisoners Is Called Routine in U.S.
Physical and sexual abuse of prisoners, similar to what has been uncovered in Iraq, takes place in American prisons with little public knowledge or concern, according to corrections officials, inmates, [prisoners], and human rights advocates.
A Catch-22 for Ex-Offenders
Tuesday, April 6, 2004 -- As the Bush administration focuses attention on ex-offenders with its modest program to help them return to the community, an eye-opening new study shows that the effort will require a lot more than re-entry programs.
A Quite Deliberate Failure: Reflections on the Politics of Crime
Though it is always difficult to predict the outcome of an election in the United States, it is quite a bit easier to make accurate pronouncements about the way in which an election campaign will unfold.
Personal Voices: America From Inside Federal Prison
I offer these thoughts to readers who may have an interest in knowing how the growing American prison population perceives the electoral process. Elections are the essence of democracy; they give each eligible voter an opportunity to be heard.
Fighting for Florida: Disenfranchised Florida Felons Struggle to Regain Their Rights US: TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - Gov. Jeb Bush looked out over a roomful of felons appealing to him for something they had lost, and tried to reassure them.
Abolish the Security Housing Units: MIM
March 6 -- Protesters took to the streets in cities across the state of California to demand California prisons shut down the Security Housing Units (SHU). Like other control unit prisons across the country, the SHU are prisons within a prison. They are solitary confinement cells where prisoners are locked up 23 hours a day for years at a time. The one hour a day these prisoner sometimes get outside of their cell is spent alone in an exercise pen not much larger than their cell, with no direct sunlight.
USA: Sobering Prison Statistics
US: If recent incarceration rates remain unchanged, an estimated 1 out of every 20 persons (5.1%) will serve time in a prison during their lifetime.
Helping Prisoners Find Their Way Home?
Antonio Pinder used to be scared of returning home from prison, stricken by fear that he would fall back into the life that landed him behind bars. He hadn't had a steady job before he was sent away 13 years ago, and he worried that he never would. A year out of prison, he is still searching for work.
US Prison system ending love affair with incarceration?
After 25 years of explosive growth in the U.S. prison system, is this country finally ending its love affair with incarceration? Perhaps, but as in any abusive relationship, breaking up will be hard to do.
CONS COMMIT CRIMES IN HASTE, NOW CAN REPENT AT LAWTEY - -- Gov. Jeb Bush, in a Christmas Eve address to prisoners at the nation's first ''faith-based'' prison, in North Florida.
CURE --- Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants
CURE --- is a nation-wide grass roots organization dedicated to reducing crime through reform of the criminal justice system.[Criminal Law System.]
The Truth About Private Prisons
Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the nation's largest operator of prisons for profit, is celebrating its 20th anniversary throughout this year "at both the company's corporate Nashville office and at all of the more than 60 prisons, jails and detention centers under CCA ownership and/or management."
CCA PRIVATE PRISONS: REPORT GRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP
New National Study of Corrections Corporation of America Warns Investors and Legislators of Risky Investment. Report explores continuing operational and financial problems; questions CCA's long-term viability as states reassess prison policies.
Finally, States Release The Pressure on Prisons?
US: After decades of massive prison growth, America may be ending its love affair with incarceration. Policymakers around the country, some of whom previously supported ratcheting up punishments, have begun to rethink the wisdom of unbridled prison expansion, and are advocating alternatives to simply "locking them up and throwing away the key."
California Parole System Deemed 'Broken'
SACRAMENTO, Calif: California spends $1.5 billion annually on parolees who mostly fail and are sent back behind bars because they are no better prepared for life on the outside than the day they entered prison, according to a report.
People with Mental Retardation in the Criminal Justice System
Based on the 1990 census, an estimated 6.2 to 7.5 million people in the United States have mental retardation. Various studies have suggested between 2 percent to 10 percent of the prison population has mental retardation.
USA: With Cash Tight, States Reassess Long Jail Terms
OLYMPIA, Wash., Nov. 6 - After two decades of passing ever tougher sentencing laws and prompting a prison building boom, state legislatures facing budget crises are beginning to rethink their costly approaches to crime.
A STRUGGLE ON TWO FRONTS: PRISONS & IMPERIALIST WAR
After a war waged by the U.S. military against Vietnam which took the lives of more than 3 million Vietnamese people and more than 58,000 GIs, the U.S. finally withdrew in 1975. It had suffered its first official major military defeat by a united people struggle led by the Vietnamese, along with a mass U.S. anti-war movement.
Report on State Prisons Cites Mental Illness
NEW YORK: Nearly one of every four New York State prisoners who are kept in punitive segregation [solitary confinement], confined to a small cell at least 23 hours a day are mentally ill, according to a new report by a nonprofit group that has been critical of state prison policies.
High court keeps alive case of prisoners held in solitary
NEW ORLEANS: The nation's highest court refused Monday to kill a lawsuit brought by two prisoners and an ex-prisoner at the Louisiana State Penitentiary who spent decades in solitary confinement.
US: Mentally Ill Mistreated in Prison More Mentally Ill in Prison Than in Hospitals (New York, October 22, 2003) Mentally ill offenders face mistreatment and neglect in many U.S. prisons, Human Rights Watch. "Prisons have become the nation's primary mental health facilities. But for those with serious illnesses, prison can be the worst place to be."
Shut down the Security Torture Units
San Francisco: October 18 In solidarity with other prison activist organizations, MIM, RAIL, the Barrio Defense Committee (BDC) and the Prison Reform Unity Project held a four hour rally in San Francisco demanding the Security Housing Units (SHUs) in California prisons be shut down.
Solitary Confinement: Mental illness in prisons
As noted earlier, inmates [prisoners] with mental illness are over represented in our toughest prison settings. Symptoms of mental illness (i.e., delays in response time, paranoia, difficulty interpreting the actions of others, command hallucinations, and so on) can make complying with prison rules difficult.
Post-Incarceration Sentences
Pat: "The 1990s brought a new front in the war on drugs, featuring a new layer of the Prison Industrial Complex, which has the effect of ensuring that people coming in contact with the criminal punishment system remain within the grasp of the Prison Industrial Complex even beyond prison walls."
Inside Prison, Outside the Law
Every year, tens of thousands of prisoners in state and federal custody are attacked. The exact number who die is difficult to determine: According to the nonprofit Criminal Justice Institute, in 2000, the most recent year for which figures have been compiled, 55 prisoners were murdered, 39 died "accidentally," and 118 died for unknown reasons.
Day Seven of the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health:
PASADENA, CALIF: On the seventh day of a hunger strike by six psychiatric survivors to oppose human rights violations in the mental health system, the American Psychiatric Association faces a direct and unprecedented challenge from a Scientific Panel of 14 academics and clinicians.
Supreme Court Justice Criticises Sentencing Guidelines
San Francisco, August 9, 2003, Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said today that prison terms are too long and that he favours scrapping the practice of setting mandatory minimum sentences for some federal crimes.
US prison population 2.1 million
The US prison population grew more than twice as fast last year as in 2001, bringing the total number of people held behind bars in the United States to more than 2.1 million, a record, according to a government report.
McKean Federal Prison: An Alleged Model
McKean, a federal correctional institution [? prison], does everything that "make 'em bust rocks" politicians decry--imagine, educating inmates [prisoners]! And it works. [Allegedly works.]
Prisoners Justice Day Press Release (Montreal)
On August 10th, 1974, Eddie Nalon bled to death in a solitary confinement unit at Millhaven Maximum Security Prison near Kingston,Ontario when the emergency call button in his cell failed to work. An inquest later found that the call buttons in that unit had been deactivated by the guards.
Notebook of a Prison Abolitionist
In his autobiography, Frederick Douglass recalls how as a slave he would occasionally hear of the "abolitionists." He did not know the full meaning of the word at first, but he heard it used in ways that he found appealing.
Study Warns of Rising Tide of Released Prisoners
Washington: More than 625,000 former prisoners will be coming back into U.S. society this year, part of a record flow of prisoners who will face crushing obstacles in finding work and housing and repairing long-fractured family ties, according to a newly released study.
Incite Statement Gender Violence and the Prison Industrial Complex
We call social justice movements to develop strategies and analysis that address both state AND interpersonal violence, particularly violence against women.
Second International Conference on Human Rights & Prison Reform
**This second gathering will be much smaller and more in depth in participation. A report on the human rights violation of discrimination in regard to prisoners will be produced. This report will be given to the Subcommission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights which will be having its annual meeting near our conference and is the"think tank" for the human rights agenda of the United Nations.
Judged Forever- The Orange County Register
US: California's largest job-placement program for parolees will be shut down May 31 after an Orange County Register investigation found that ex-convicts were sent to questionable jobs [?] and that the state was charged for placements that did not occur. [? According to the ruling-class]
California Family Visiting Case
US: CALIFORNIA: Today (5/03/08) in Superior Court around twenty friends and family members of inmates from CSP Solano showed up to show their support in the Gordon vs. CA Department of Corrections (Case #322862) which deals with the subject of bringing back Family Visits to all inmates.
Prison Rates Among Blacks Reach a Peak, Report Finds
An estimated 12 percent of African-American men ages 20 to 34 are in jail or prison, according to a report released yesterday by the Justice Department.
Justices question prison visitation policies
WASHINGTON: In a case that could affect the visitation rights of millions of prisoners, Supreme Court justices on Wednesday struggled with the question of whether inmates have a constitutional right to visits with friends and family.
