Judges' misdeeds will remain secret

No naming and shaming in legal system shake-up

UK: Judges who are disciplined for bad behaviour will not have the findings against them made public under a complaints regime to be launched next year.

The decision to treat judges differently to doctors, barristers, solicitors and police officers was announced by the lord chancellor and the lord chief justice 29 June.

The exception, as at present, will be those judges whose misdeeds are trumpeted in the media - for example, those who make racist remarks in open court which are picked up by reporters.

In those cases, it is necessary for the sake of public confidence in the justice system to reveal the outcome of an investigation, the lord chancellor, Lord Falconer, said.

He disclosed that 250 complaints of misconduct against judges and tribunal chairmen had been investigated by the Department of Constitutional Affairs last year, 68 of which were upheld and resulted in disciplinary action. Eleven were serious enough to be referred to senior judges for investigation.

Judges have been admonished or reprimanded for such behaviour as racist language, sexual harassment, discourtesy in court, delays in delivering judgments and drink driving. One referred in court to "the nigger in the woodpile", while another said that fraud was an offence prevalent among Nigerians.

One who had previously been reprimanded for kissing a court usher had to apologise after saying, in reference to doctors writing sick notes: "I know many people with duodenal ulcers who work like niggers." Yet another was reprimanded for falling asleep twice in a rape trial, causing the hearing to be abandoned.

Circuit judges may be removed by the lord chancellor "on the ground of incapacity or misbehaviour".

This power has only once been exercised, in 1983 after a judge was convicted of smuggling whisky and cigarettes into Britain in his yacht.

From April 2006 a new Office for Judicial Complaints will deal with allegations about judges' personal conduct, though complaints over the way they conduct court proceedings will be outside its remit.

That will be part of a shake-up which will transfer the responsibility for choosing and promoting judges from the lord chancellor to a new Judicial Appointments Commission.

A judicial appointments and conduct ombudsman will be appointed to oversee both the appointments commission and the complaints office.

Candidates for the bench who feel they have been treated unfairly will be able to take their cases to the ombudsman, as will a judge subject to a misconduct complaint or a complainant who feels the investigation has not been properly handled.

Unlike judges in the US and Canada, those in England and Wales will not normally be subjected to public disclosure of the fact that they have been disciplined.

An agreement between the lord chief justice and the lord chancellor, under which they will share responsibility for disciplining judges as part of the new arrangements, says the two "may agree in a particular case that public confidence in the justice system demands that the fact that a judicial office-holder has been subject to disciplinary action, or has been exonerated, be made public".

The lord chief justice, Lord Woolf, said he supported keeping judges' names under wraps: "One has got to take into account the need still for the public to appear before the judge and for him or her to continue to perform his or her job as a judge."

By Clare Dyer posted 2 July 05

Related:

Judges reveal anger over curbs on power!
UK: Senior judges fear that a succession of recent laws pushed through by the government could fetter their ability to administer justice and to act as a check on the executive.

Here come de Judge - Time to Leave [266]
There have always been examples of rulings and interpretations that have supported the saying "The law is an ass". This is increasingly the case, because even the best intentioned judges are now facing an avalanche of new technologies and social change. But, it is no good making excuses for the judiciary and continuing to accept their strange interpretations. We must recognise that not only judges but the whole legal system will struggle more and more. In the end the whole system will become a farce. This is the way empires end.

Scandal? New South Wales Local Courts

Media access limited by new laws: Opposition

The New South Wales Opposition says the media access to documents in criminal court proceedings will now be restricted under new laws, which come into effect now. Shadow Attorney-General Andrew Tink says there could be delays in reporting cases because the media will have to apply for access to the files after cases are finished.

The new law says access to documents can be delayed until after proceedings are finally disposed of and that may take a long time!

Bob Debus??????????????????????????????????Please Bob?????????????????????????????????? Come on ?????????????????? But Bob!

In cases that need to be hidden for a long time or perhaps forever this could be long enough for an important person to finish the job they are not entitled to do.

Political insurance? Like a politician booked for drink driving. Or a Judge for lurking in public toilets. Who knows what you'll have to wait for?

I can tell you what cases you won't have to wait for though. People the government want to exploit and convict whether the purpose is the crime, public example or loss of government revenue.

The important people will escape from the public gaze like they never committed a crime at all. People who already are not asked questions because of their high position will go unnoticed after they have committed a crime.

This legislation protects the government and gives the government grace to either report or not depending on the circumstances behind the crime and whether it suits them or not.

Presently when documents are tendered in court the access for the media follows very soon after.

The laws apply to local court proceedings.

It stands to reason because low courts have a history of corruption. Magistrates are bought and sold in NSW everyday for the people who cannot afford a damaged reputation.

In a statement, the department says it will be meeting Police Legal Services today to clarify any misunderstandings about the new provisions.

By Public Deception 7 July 03

THE CHOOK: THAT'S CROOK? The Attorney-General's department says the changes enshrine in law the right of the media to access court documents available in open court. What! The media didn't have that right before? Nonsense!

Related:

O'Shane blasts constitution
Controversial New South Wales magistrate Pat O'shane has described the Australian Constitution as flawed and grossly inappropriate.

Retrospective Laws: Mesmerised like a chook syndrome
What is it? This chook syndrome. Perhaps it is when we allow 800-year-old rule of law to diminish for a dictator like Bob Carr.

Innocent until proven guilty
Presumption of innocence. A hallowed principle of criminal law to the effect that the government has the burden of proving every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt and that the defendant has no burden to prove his innocence. It arises at the first stage of the criminal process but it is not a true presumption because the defendant is not required to come forward with proof of his innocence once evidence of guilt is introduced to avoid a directed verdict of guilty.

Civil Liberties Council slams NSW law and order fight
The Civil Liberties Council says the law and order fight in New South Wales is an indictment on both the major parties. Spokesman Cameron Murphy says the State is already one of the toughest in the area of criminal justice in the world. He says the tightening of bail laws will only add to the number of people in jail.

Abolition of 800 year old double jeopardy law a crime
The New South Wales Opposition has described a decision by the State Government to abolish the double jeopardy law as a political stunt.

NSW A-G moves to stop criminals and ex-criminals selling stories
From next month criminals or ex-criminals who try to profit (earn a living for paid work, like writing a book etc..) from their crimes in New South Wales will have the proceeds confiscated.

ARE YOU INNOCENT?
The Australian Law Reform Commission had recommended that the Innocence Panel be independent and have the power to investigate alleged miscarriages of justice.

Litigants are drowning: in the High Court
There were so many self represented litigants appearing in the High Court that more than half of its registry staff's time was taken up in dealing with them. The "go it alone" litigants have to take on tasks well above their qualified league causing them stress. This growing problem cannot be left unchecked.

Murder charge first for DNA data bank link, but not the same as solving the murder Mass DNA testing of prisoners has [allegedly] led to the first NSW case of a person being charged with a previously unsolved murder as a result of a controversial gene-matching data bank.

Prisoners can prove innocence for $20?
Les Kennedy Daily Telegraph reported today that" Prisoners who believe that DNA will prove they were wrongly convicted will have the chance to prove their innocence for a mere $20 administration fee. The move comes 20 months after NSW inmates were asked to provide DNA for comparison with a databank of DNA from unsolved crime scenes for possible convictions.

Mr. & Mrs. Mandatory Sentencing
Well congratulations to the bride and groom. Could you please be upstanding and raise your glasses for Mr. And Mrs. Mandatory.