Three-strikes and you're out of the family?
A three-strikes plan, which uses the threat of fines and jail to (force) parents to meet their parental obligations after divorce, could be introduced under a draft proposal from the parliamentary committee charged with reviewing the Family Law Act.
Non-custodial parents mainly fathers? Who for example fail to pick up their children at the time dictated by Family Court orders would face "reasonable but minimum financial penalties" the first and second time they breach conditions? If the parent breaches the conditions for a third time and shows a "pattern of deliberate defiance", then all access rights could be withdrawn.
But why mainly fathers? Is father a dirty word in 2003? Could that be discriminatory considering 80-20 Family Court rule that's 20 per cent access for fathers and 80 per cent access for mothers. So I suppose fathers are more likely to breach the arrangements that are typically unfairly made in the first place.
How does zero tolerance work when families are based on trial and error? You tell me. I'll tell you. Then we'll both know. I guess you don't have to be a rocket scientist to get on the parliamentary committee charged with reviewing the Family Law Act.
The parent could also face imprisonment if consistently continuing to breach court orders.
GKCNN has been told the fines are intended as a "wrap over the knuckles" to encourage the parent to correct their behaviour. The same "wrap over the knuckles" force and threats used by our government to get short term results which helps the community accept, quite wrongly, that "wrapping people over the knuckles" is a way to get things done. Which it is not!
How about inviting people into the decision making process and finding out more information about those involved. How about asking how parents can help, therefore getting and obligation from the parents to help, because they may have come up with a solution, taking into account their circumstances.
All too hard for the government, they'd rather find a violent solution that gives them short-term results but a long-term disaster coupled with the inflation of it.
It's okay though, because the fundamental group unit of society (the family) and the taxpayers will pay for it won't they?
GKCNN understands the recommendation is contained in a draft report distributed to members of the Family and Community Affairs Committee for their comment yesterday. The final report is due by the end of the year.
The draft report also is understood to recommend giving grandparents for the first time special status in custody hearings a proposal that could make it easier for them to gain custody of their grandchildren.
In addition, parents would have to include grandparents when developing their parenting plans, and to develop a range of strategies to ensure they are part of the mediation process.
The three-strike recommendation flows from a series of hearings where children have told of the disappointment of waiting for parents who never arrive. While the Family Court can fine parents who fail to meet their responsibilities; it is understood that the committee members believe they do not use their powers enough.
In other words the stick is not big enough, long enough and hard enough like a prison sentence or a fine?
Other recommendations being considered include requiring all separating couples to lodge parenting plans with a new tribunal.
The tribunal could include a child psychologist, a mediator and a family law expert. This effectively would mean that custody disputes would be removed from the Family Court and dealt with by a tribunal.
Family Court Chief Justice Alastair Nicholson has attacked this proposal, describing it as unconstitutional and impractical.
Not just that but lazy and general. Not particularly suitable for a families individual needs but more suitable for a bunch of victim industry graziers looking for a feed. Like lawyer's psychologists and mediators.
You need these people with a formula that incites violence and you also need to jail those who don't agree three times. Short answer! Lazy corporate greed opposed to a better community response.
The Prime Minister asked the Family and Community Affairs Committee to investigate a range of highly emotive issues, including automatic 50-50-child custody after divorce, when he announced the inquiry in June.
Frustrations over child custody and support consistently rank among the most common complaints raised with government backbenchers.
By No Human Error 25 Nov 03
Related:
Fatherless Society "80-20 rule Vs 50-50 rule" family law
A Federal Parliamentary inquiry has heard that more children will grow up without fathers unless changes are made to family law. The committee is considering whether separated parents should share equal custody of their children.
80-20 Family Court rule irrational: Martian
A Martian came down from Mars and he noticed that children were the products of a father and a mother. When the family split up the children were still the products of a father and a mother.
Australia to tackle child abuse and rescue impoverished children?
A national report on child protection in the Northern Territory has blasted the system, saying it has abandoned the most impoverished children and families in Australia.
ATSIC call to smack kids?
The ATSIC commissioner said the high levels of regulation was not unlike the attention focused on Aboriginal families that led to the creation of a Stolen Generation of Aboriginal people. Mr Hill said he did not condone violence and admitted he did not smack his own children, but he stressed he wanted the issue of child discipline debated among Aboriginal people and community leaders.
No-Smacking Day for Children in NSW
Patmalar Ambikapathy the Children's Commissioner, HOBART Tasmania spoke to Gregory Kable a caseworker at Justice Action at the Controlling Crime Conference at Redfern in Sydney yesterday and we both realised how parallel our ideas about crime prevention were.
Judge renews child detainee release call
A Family Court judge, for a second time, has appealed to Immigration Minister, war criminal, Philip Ruddock to address the issue of children in detention.
Partnership to tackle Aboriginal children's health issues
Australian of the Year Professor Fiona Stanley has called for a sense of urgency in tackling the serious health problems facing Aboriginal children.
Graffiti: What they see is what you get
Father David Equal, a community leader has described the graffiti as the response to neglect by Australia's leaders, and the mainstream media, who have discriminated against people, recently.
Ruddock to challenge Family Court ruling
Ruddock said it is unfortunate the Full Court of the Family Court made the decision. He said a successful High Court challenge could see the children returned to detention.
Men told to change role but what for?
Fathers must take an equal role in parenting before their marriages end in divorce if changes to child custody laws are going to work, Pru Goward said yesterday.
Parents on the inside leave children on the edge
They have been dubbed the forgotten generation - the innocent casualties of their parents' crimes. New research shows that in 2001 14,500 NSW children had a parent in jail. And 60,000 NSW children under 16 have experienced the incarceration of a parent, more than half enduring the trauma of separation before they turn five.
States to cooperate on school curriculums but social skills don't rate? State and territory education ministers say Federal Education Minister Brendan Nelson's heavy-handed threats to school funding will not assist their ambitious initiative to develop consistent school curriculum’s in key subjects.[?]
Family Law: Shared parenting arrangements
My children were four and two years of age and it's been fourteen years since I seen my children who are now adults. I don't know where they are because the government fragmented us by order of the Family Court of Australia, which should be called, the Anti-Family Court of Australia. Big yawn!!!
School Curriculum needs balance? Life Skills and Academic Skills go hand in hand man Colin you need to be the students friends not their judge. Only when you can invite the students into the decision making process will you get an obligation by them to change their behaviour, because you Colin could lead by example and not by power.
Australian fathers under terrorist attack-by its Politicians
Ruthless terrorists tactics are used by the state deny devoted fathers their children, and place vulnerable children at risk when they are denied their fathers protection. Five hundred thousand Australian children are denied contact with their father usually resulting from orders of the state by the Family and other Courts.
When is Michael Richardson going to remove the offending Family Court affidavit from the NSW Parliament website? Criminal: Hills district MP Michael Richardson. When is he going to remove these uncorroborated lies and family court pleadings on the confidential Family Court affidavit from the NSW Parliament website?
NSW education professor warns further commitment needed
The author of a report on the New South Wales education system has urged the major political parties to do more for education in the election campaign.
Fiona Stanley, the children's crusader
It is all about prevention. As Fiona Stanley sees it, with one in five Australian teenagers experiencing significant mental health problems, there are just not enough treatment services to cope with the demand.
Parents call for feedback on social skills
Parents are calling for the same level of feedback on their children's social development as on their academic progress, according to a national survey.
Call to update suicide prevention strategy: study
A four-year study of suicides by people under the age of 18 in New South Wales, has found little difference between rates of suicide in rural and regional areas and cities.
Alcohol is just the beginning
People who start using alcohol by their mid teens are more than twice as likely as others to experiment with different drugs and to become dependent on drugs a major Australian study has found.
The punishment: Is the 'crime'
The punishment is the crime according to retired chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia Justice Alistair Nicholson. "Smacking a child ought to be seen as assault".
RESTORING TRUE JUSTICE:
Australian prisons are fast becoming the new asylums of the third millennium. The prison industry is booming, while Australia spends far less on mental health services than similar countries.
The Seed
Respect, you only get out what you have put in. What about Life Skills, Communication and Conflict Resolution. Evolution, perhaps some children and adults miss the whole or part of the course. I did, and so how surprised do you think I was when I realised my parents missed the course as well. Things like Compromise, Win Win, Empathy, and Love. Invisible energy and other skills like public speaking, how to Relate, Assuming, Blaming, Forgiveness, Freedom and Discrimination. This is how I learned respect. If you don't know what it is then how do you relate?
The Law According to Gregory Wayne Kable
I was sharply separated from both my children aged just 4 years and two years and sent to prison for the manslaughter of my wife. I cared for my children when my wife worked and I believe that I still had a responsibility to them even after the crisis situation and tragedy. I wanted to reassure them now and find out how they were doing.
Govt, police 'let off the hook' Haneef inquiry
15 years ago